Think
Citizen journalists unite!
Wow:
In a sign of continued weakness in his home state, an online poll shows Sen. John McCain trailing Sen. Barack Obama by 3-percentage points in Arizona. The poll also shows the candidacy of Liberterian Bob Barr is having a significant impact on McCain's campaign by siphoning off conservative voters nationwide.
The latest public poll has Obama and Udall leading McCain and Schaffer:
Colorado voters prefer Democratic Sen. Barack Obama over Republican Sen. John McCain for president by a five-point margin, a lead also found in three other swing states in a new poll released today. . .
[T]he poll also showed Democrat Mark Udall leading over Republican Bob Schaffer in the Senate race by a 10-point margin, with 12 percent of voters undecided.
In the extended entry, I posted the text from a press release we just sent out about The Big Tent - an event to be held during the Convention in Denver that we're co-hosting with the Alliance for Sustainable Colorado and our friends at Daily Kos. To learn more, read the release. If you're interested in participating, apply for a pass at BigTentDenver.com. Read More »
Newsweek's latest poll shows the post-primary bounce:
Barack finally has his bounce. For weeks many political experts and pollsters have been wondering why the race between Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain had stayed so tight, even after the Illinois senator wrested the nomination from Hillary Clinton. With numbers consistently showing rock-bottom approval ratings for President Bush and a large majority of Americans unhappy with the country's direction, the opposing-party candidate should, in the normal course, have attracted more disaffected voters. Now it looks as if Obama is doing just that. A new NEWSWEEK Poll shows that he has a substantial double-digit lead, 51 percent to 36 percent, over McCain among registered voters nationwide.
So much for the concern trolling by some on the left about Obama's strength in key swing states:
Concerns about Barack Obama's ability to compete in the key swing states that have decided the last several elections are falling by the wayside, as a new poll Tuesday shows him ahead of Republican John McCain in Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.
McCain's speech Tuesday night was easily the worst I've ever seen. Period. I can't, for the life of me, figure out what his campaign was thinking. They played right into Obama's hands -- by referring constantly to Obama's "change" message, by weakly attempting a crowd (that was oddly small and unengaged), and by giving the speech just before Obama's so that the entire world could see the contrast.
McCain's seemed old, tired, cold, distant, uncomfortable, and even a little creepy (what's with that weird grin?). Obama was youthful (loved the fist bump with Michelle), energized, passionate, at ease, and inspiring.
McCain's audience seemed like a bunch of extras who couldn't quite understand what the director wanted them to do. Obama's crowd was . . . a typical Obama crowd -- HUGE (30,000 estimate, including the thousands outside the building who couldn't even get in), determined, passionate, and completely tuned in to Obama's every word.
Just for fun, let's take another gander:
McCain's seemed old, tired, cold, distant, uncomfortable, and even a little creepy (what's with that weird grin?). Obama was youthful (loved the fist bump with Michelle), energized, passionate, at ease, and inspiring.
McCain's audience seemed like a bunch of extras who couldn't quite understand what the director wanted them to do. Obama's crowd was . . . a typical Obama crowd -- HUGE (30,000 estimate, including the thousands outside the building who couldn't even get in), determined, passionate, and completely tuned in to Obama's every word.
Just for fun, let's take another gander:
It's official. He has the delegates and is the Democratic nominee.
My partner and I just watched Hillary's speech. And before that we watched John McCain's speech. We both had the overwhelming thought that John McCain can't hold a candle to Hillary Clinton in terms of having "it". Shaun said that it's like the difference between a minor league and major league baseball team.
So much has been made by the media of the fact that Barack has lost elections even when it looked like he was going to win the nomination. But I really think that's said much less about him than it has about Hillary.
UPDATE: Obama's giving his victory speech now. All I can say is "wow". He's an amazing speaker. The money line so far: "there are many words to describe John McCain's attempt to describe his embrace of Bush's failed policies as bi-partisan, but 'change' isn't one of them".
UPDATE: Another great line: "John McCain has talked a lot about visiting Iraq in the last few weeks. But maybe if he'd spent more time visiting the towns in Michigan, Ohio and Minnesota that have been hardest hit by this economy he'd understand the kind of change Americans are looking for".
UPDATE: "We may call ourselves 'Democrats' and 'Republicans', but we are Americans first. . . Americans first."
My partner and I just watched Hillary's speech. And before that we watched John McCain's speech. We both had the overwhelming thought that John McCain can't hold a candle to Hillary Clinton in terms of having "it". Shaun said that it's like the difference between a minor league and major league baseball team.
So much has been made by the media of the fact that Barack has lost elections even when it looked like he was going to win the nomination. But I really think that's said much less about him than it has about Hillary.
UPDATE: Obama's giving his victory speech now. All I can say is "wow". He's an amazing speaker. The money line so far: "there are many words to describe John McCain's attempt to describe his embrace of Bush's failed policies as bi-partisan, but 'change' isn't one of them".
UPDATE: Another great line: "John McCain has talked a lot about visiting Iraq in the last few weeks. But maybe if he'd spent more time visiting the towns in Michigan, Ohio and Minnesota that have been hardest hit by this economy he'd understand the kind of change Americans are looking for".
UPDATE: "We may call ourselves 'Democrats' and 'Republicans', but we are Americans first. . . Americans first."
Bob's got some splainin' to do. The Grand Junction Sentinel reports:
This opens a HUUUUUGE can of worms for Schaffer an begs a LOT of questions. What did Schaffer know, and when did he know it? What should he have known? Did Schaffer have anything to do with securing the earmark for Orr? Did he really cut ties with this group? And are Bob Schaffer and Dick Wadhams actually the same person?Al Lewis from the Denver Post weighs in:
The founder of a nonprofit linked to Republican U.S. Senate candidate Bob Schaffer was convicted late Wednesday of defrauding the federal government in receiving $3.6 million in alternative-fuel research funds. . .
According to court records, Orr defrauded Congress into awarding a 2002 earmark to a nonprofit he founded for an Environmental Protection Agency grant to test an alternative fuel additive called “vapor phase combustion.”
More than $2 million of the revenue actually made it into the coffers of the nonprofit Orr founded in 2001, the National Alternative Fuels Foundation, to handle the EPA grant funds.
Schaffer, according to his Senate financial disclosure, was a member of the board of directors of the National Alternative Fuels Foundation from October 2004 to March 2005.
Schaffer’s tenure at the foundation, according to Orr’s 2006 indictment, overlaps with the time period Orr’s foundation was accepting the fraudulently obtained federal funds.
Dick Wadhams, Schaffer’s campaign manager, said Schaffer joined the nonprofit because he was interested in the development of alternative fuels, including those purportedly being developed by the foundation.
Wadhams said Schaffer left the firm as soon as he learned about the investigation. “
He was only on the board a little more than four months,” Wadhams said. “As soon as he found out the problems with Mr. Orr, he resigned from the board.”
Wadhams said Schaffer was not involved in securing the earmark for Orr when Schaffer was a member of Congress from 1997 to 2002.
This opens a HUUUUUGE can of worms for Schaffer an begs a LOT of questions. What did Schaffer know, and when did he know it? What should he have known? Did Schaffer have anything to do with securing the earmark for Orr? Did he really cut ties with this group? And are Bob Schaffer and Dick Wadhams actually the same person?Al Lewis from the Denver Post weighs in:
Schaffer joined the board at the behest of his longtime political associate Scott Shires, a notable GOP operative.
Shires pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in the case. His sentencing is slated for June 23. He faces up to a year in prison and a $25,000 fine.
If Schaffer and the members of Congress who put up the $3.6 million earmark are indeed Orr's victims, it's hard to imagine how they could be such easy marks.
Years before Orr set his sights on them, he was allegedly fleecing guys like Larry Potthoff, a Franktown general contractor, who told me he lost about $13,000 to Orr beginning in the mid-1990s.
"He kept sending letters, saying he's talking to Saudi Arabia . . . and on and on and on. But you could never get him on the phone. . . . He used Scott Shires as his go-between guy," Potthoff said. "I called several times and told him I wanted my money back. No response."
In case you haven't seen the television coverage yet, a mile-wide tornado has struck in Weld County.




Good grief, Bob Schaffer seems to have a knack for finding controversy. Seems that 9news report last week about the criminal trial of William Orr left out an important little detail. From Colorado Pols:
I hear that Dick Wadhams says Schaffer didn't observe Orr performing any forced abortions, so no worries.
The criminal case going to the jury concerns allegedly fraudulent representations made to the federal government by Orr's National Alternative Fuels Foundation (NAFF), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. According to the criminal indictment, NAFF received over $2 million in grant money to research a new fuel additive. Specifically, the indictment alleges that NAFF submitted false documents--including bogus scientific testing--to the EPA in support of the grant request from 2001 to 2004. Orr is also alleged to have solicited almost $600,000 from private investors to "research" this fuel additive, most of which was deposited into his personal bank account.
We're shocked 9NEWS only notes that Orr "worked with politicians on Capitol Hill," since there is much more to the story: the Director of the National Alternative Fuels Foundation during 2004 and 2005 was former Rep. Bob Schaffer.
Schaffer served as Director of the NAFF from October 2004 until March 2005, just two months before the nonprofit was administratively dissolved. By May of the following year, Orr had been indicted. This is critical because according to documents we've seen, Orr continued to make these allegedly false reports to the EPA through at least December of 2004--well into Schaffer's tenure as Director.
Schaffer was not himself indicted in this case, though his name did appear on the witness list. We are told that the case against Orr is pretty strong: a jury is entering deliberations as we write this to decide the truth of the matter. If Orr is found guilty, watch for the next logical question--what Bob Schaffer knew about this alleged fraud and when he knew it--to become quite urgent.
I hear that Dick Wadhams says Schaffer didn't observe Orr performing any forced abortions, so no worries.
AP has the story:
Doctors for the Massachusetts Democrat say tests conducted after Kennedy suffered a seizure this weekend show a tumor in his left parietal lobe. Preliminary results from a biopsy of the brain identified the cause of the seizure as a malignant glioma.
Holy shit. This is absolutley despicable:
Republican Mike Huckabee responded to an offstage noise during his speech to the National Rifle Association by suggesting it was Barack Obama diving to the floor because someone had aimed a gun at him.
Hearing a loud noise and interrupting his speech, Huckabee said: "That was Barack Obama. He just tripped off a chair. He's getting ready to speak and somebody aimed a gun at him and he -- he dove for the floor."
There were only a few murmurs in the crowd after the remark.

Spring is in the air, the legislative session is finally over and election season is starting to heat up. A perfect time for another "Progresstival" Happy Hour with the staff of ProgressNow, Jay Marvin--host of AM760's popular progressive morning show, and progressive state lawmakers.
When? Wednesday, May 21st from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m.
Where? The Uptown Tavern at 538 E 17th St, Denver (corner of 17th and Pearl)
The first 250 early birds who respond get in for the whopping deal of just a $15 donation. After that, it's $20. Click here to make your donation online now (we'll have your name at the door)
It's official, the California Supreme Court has ruled that state's gay marriage ban unconstitutional:
Wow.
UPDATE: Here's a link to the opinion.
UPDATE: Ellen's getting hitched!
"There can be no doubt that extending the designation of marriage to same-sex couples, rather than denying it to all couples, is the equal protection remedy that is most consistent with our state's general legislative policy and preference," the ruling said.
"Accordingly, in light of the conclusions we reach concerning the constitutional questions brought to us for resolution, we determine that the language of Section 300 [California's Defense of Marriage Act] limiting the designation of marriage to a 'union between a man and a woman' is unconstitutional, and that the remaining statutory language must be understood as making the designation of marriage available to both opposite-sex and same-sex couples."
Wow.
UPDATE: Here's a link to the opinion.
UPDATE: Ellen's getting hitched!
Pat Buchanan, no less, has called this McCain campaign attack (delivered by McCain surrogate George Bush), "unprecedented" just now on MSNBC. To launch a political attack such as this on foreign soil has never, ever been done. The question now is, will John McCain repudiate Bush's comments? Here's the story from CNN:
JERUSALEM (CNN) - In a particularly sharp blast from halfway around the world, President Bush suggested Thursday that Sen. Barack Obama and other Democrats are in favor of "appeasement" of terrorists in the same way U.S. leaders appeased Nazis in the run-up to World War II.
"Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," said Bush, in what White House aides privately acknowledged was a reference to calls by Obama and other Democrats for the U.S. president to sit down for talks with leaders like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
"We have heard this foolish delusion before," Bush said in remarks to the Israeli Knesset. "As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American Senator declared: 'Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is -- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history."
The remarks seemed to be a not-so-subtle attempt to continue to raise doubts about Obama with Jewish-Americans. Those doubts were already stoked by Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, when he recently charged that Obama is the favored candidate of the terror group Hamas.
Obama last week called the Hamas allegation a "smear" and the Democratic presidential frontrunner also quickly lashed out Thursday at Bush's speech in Israel in a prepared statement released to CNN by his campaign.
"It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 6Oth anniversary of Israel's independence to launch a false political attack," said Obama. "It is time to turn the page on eight years of policies that have strengthened Iran and failed to secure America or our ally Israel.
CNN has the story.
UPDATE: On a much more surprising note, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) also endorsed Obama today. Along with Emily's List, NARAL is probably the most powerful women's rights organization in the country.
UPDATE: On a much more surprising note, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) also endorsed Obama today. Along with Emily's List, NARAL is probably the most powerful women's rights organization in the country.
The biggest story from last night wasn't the expected result in West Virginia. It was another special election in which a Congressional seat long held by Republicans, and with a sizable Republican majority to this day, falling to a Democrat. Here's the story on MSNBC.com. DailyKos has a great post about this as well.
Posts By Month
Posted Aug 21, 2008 11:05am
Comments (2)
McCain's Potomac two-step on Colorado's water flat-footed
Posted Aug 21, 2008 9:55am
Comments (0)
Does anyone know any Iraq/Afghan Vets in CD4?
Posted Aug 21, 2008 8:56am
Comments (0)
Heading "out of doors" for Obama
Posted Aug 21, 2008 8:41am
Comments (0)
Change demands strength
Posted Aug 20, 2008 5:13pm
Comments (0)
Help us protect equal opportunity in Colorado
Posted Aug 20, 2008 3:42pm
Comments (0)
Tell McCain: hands off Colorado's water!
Posted Aug 20, 2008 1:38pm
Comments (0)
Club 20: Nothing but silence about McCain's Colorado water giveaway
Posted Aug 20, 2008 9:48am
Comments (1)
Cafferty's column today a must-read
Posted Aug 20, 2008 9:18am
Comments (0)
The Dems need to drop Lieberman like a bad habit
Posted Aug 20, 2008 8:32am
Comments (0)
*NOTE: ProgressNowAction is not responsible for the content of member postings.
Posts


















