Tim Allport's Blog
Labor activism and The Progressive Movement
The new web site is up, www.protectcoloradosfuture.org. This organization is in place to help us defeat the work for less lobby. Please sign up as a member and help us stand up against these attacks on middle America.
At the heart of the divide is the typical false premise that giving employees contractual rights is not good for them. This is already an "at will" state where most employees can be fired anytime for almost anything, ie, without "just cause", but that is not good enough for the work-for-less lobby, the so called "right to work" crowd. They are is a conglomerate of powerful corporate entities with a front group based in Virginia. Their purpose is to cripple labor unions and to keep the practice of democracy in the workplace an elusive goal for as many people as they can. They will demonize unions with double talk and clever slogans and glorify union busting under the scared umbrella of all that is "business friendly".
Employees in work for less states make an average of $5,333 less than those in free bargaining states. Their benefits are greatly decreased and their job security is generally non-existent. Unionized workers are simply better off and claims to the contrary ignore the basic facts. A key point is that labor activists bear no ill-will towards business or fair levels of profit. We understand that business and labor are mutually beneficial partners when balance and cooperation exist. Those of us who represent labor seek only to empower employees as an inclusive component of business and not as an expendable tool.
The individual freedom argument used work for less lobby and others is a sham. Federal law already protects the rights of non-members. Nobody has to join a union or engage in union activities that violate their religious or political beliefs. In a union shop however, the democratic principle of majority rule does require non-members to pay a fair share expense fee if they choose not to join the union.
Organized labor is a primary avenue to bridge economic inequality and the imbalance of opportunity between average people and Wall street. The labor haters should stop pretending to care about workers by branding labor unions as the enemy. Anybody who takes a non-political look at the facts knows who is truly on the side of employees and that is the unions who set the standards for labor protections.
Cross Posted (partially) Colorado Confidential
At the heart of the divide is the typical false premise that giving employees contractual rights is not good for them. This is already an "at will" state where most employees can be fired anytime for almost anything, ie, without "just cause", but that is not good enough for the work-for-less lobby, the so called "right to work" crowd. They are is a conglomerate of powerful corporate entities with a front group based in Virginia. Their purpose is to cripple labor unions and to keep the practice of democracy in the workplace an elusive goal for as many people as they can. They will demonize unions with double talk and clever slogans and glorify union busting under the scared umbrella of all that is "business friendly".
Employees in work for less states make an average of $5,333 less than those in free bargaining states. Their benefits are greatly decreased and their job security is generally non-existent. Unionized workers are simply better off and claims to the contrary ignore the basic facts. A key point is that labor activists bear no ill-will towards business or fair levels of profit. We understand that business and labor are mutually beneficial partners when balance and cooperation exist. Those of us who represent labor seek only to empower employees as an inclusive component of business and not as an expendable tool.
The individual freedom argument used work for less lobby and others is a sham. Federal law already protects the rights of non-members. Nobody has to join a union or engage in union activities that violate their religious or political beliefs. In a union shop however, the democratic principle of majority rule does require non-members to pay a fair share expense fee if they choose not to join the union.
Organized labor is a primary avenue to bridge economic inequality and the imbalance of opportunity between average people and Wall street. The labor haters should stop pretending to care about workers by branding labor unions as the enemy. Anybody who takes a non-political look at the facts knows who is truly on the side of employees and that is the unions who set the standards for labor protections.
Cross Posted (partially) Colorado Confidential
The current system for forming unions and bargaining is broken. Corporations routinely block workers' freedom to decide for themselves whether to form unions to bargain by intimidating, harassing, coercing and even firing workers.
The Employee Free Choice Act would restore workers' freedom to make our own choice about whether to have a union and bargain for a better life--without interference from management. The legislation, which the House has passed, would:
* Strengthen penalties for companies that coerce or intimidate workers;
* Establish mediation and binding arbitration when the employer and workers cannot agree on a first contract; and
* Enable workers to form unions when a majority signs union authorization cards.
* Bring needed balance to the American workplace.
Today, CEOs get contracts that protect their pay and benefits--but they fight tooth and nail to keep workers from having the same opportunity. As a result, good jobs are vanishing and health care coverage and retirement security are slipping out of reach. Only 38 percent of the public say their families are getting ahead financially, and less than a quarter think the next generation will be better off.
This bill passed the House. Please contact your Senator to urge their support. This legislation is vital to the progressive movement .
The Employee Free Choice Act would restore workers' freedom to make our own choice about whether to have a union and bargain for a better life--without interference from management. The legislation, which the House has passed, would:
* Strengthen penalties for companies that coerce or intimidate workers;
* Establish mediation and binding arbitration when the employer and workers cannot agree on a first contract; and
* Enable workers to form unions when a majority signs union authorization cards.
* Bring needed balance to the American workplace.
Today, CEOs get contracts that protect their pay and benefits--but they fight tooth and nail to keep workers from having the same opportunity. As a result, good jobs are vanishing and health care coverage and retirement security are slipping out of reach. Only 38 percent of the public say their families are getting ahead financially, and less than a quarter think the next generation will be better off.
This bill passed the House. Please contact your Senator to urge their support. This legislation is vital to the progressive movement .
Posts By Month
Posted Nov 21, 2008 2:33pm
Comments (1)
Must it be elected officials?
Posted Nov 21, 2008 2:31pm
Comments (1)
Talkingpointsmemo hiring again!
Posted Nov 19, 2008 1:44pm
Comments (0)
Group calls on CSU to reject Allard as chancellor
Posted Nov 19, 2008 1:21pm
Comments (0)
Convoy duties again
Posted Nov 19, 2008 9:10am
Comments (0)
Must Americans beg for their jobs?
Posted Nov 18, 2008 4:07pm
Comments (1)
The enemy within
Posted Nov 18, 2008 2:59pm
Comments (1)
Obama advisers: Bush era war criminals will walk- NO ACCOUNTABILITY, Period !
Posted Nov 17, 2008 8:32pm
Comments (1)
This is why Dem leadership on the Hill is pathetic
Posted Nov 17, 2008 6:05pm
Comments (1)
Following Paulson's failed experiment which created a nuclear winter
Posted Nov 17, 2008 10:51am
Comments (0)
*NOTE: ProgressNowAction is not responsible for the content of member postings.
Posts















