<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
     xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:ysrv="http://www.progressnowaction.org">
  <channel>
    <title>Richard Myers&#039;s Blog</title>
    <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/blog_rss/richardmyers</link>
    <description>An injury to one is an injury to all.</description>
                        <item>
            <title>Amendment 54 -- what the papers say</title>
            <description> Amendment 54 is a free speech issue. Free speech is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. There&#039;s a reason it is the first amendment. Without freedom of speech, you cannot protect any of the provisions of the Bill Of Rights.  Here are commentaries from Colorado newspapers.    The Rocky Mountain News   The ban applies not just to the agency the contractor is doing business with but to any state or local candidate or party. We can&#039;t fathom why, say, a paving contractor in Weld County would be considered corrupt if he and his partners donated to a state House candidate on the Western Slope, or the Democratic Party.    It gets worse. The amendment applies not only to the contractor, but also to &amp;quot;immediate family members,&amp;quot; including spouses, children, siblings, grandparents, in-laws, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews and domestic partners.    http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/oct/01/the-gag-amendment/     (continued)  </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CQ8h</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CQ8h/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:55:51 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CQ8h</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQ8h/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>The Concept of Work for Less</title>
            <description>  (and what you can do to help)  &amp;nbsp;   No one will be shocked that we&#039;re witnessing deception in politics. Someone long ago realized if you have an unpopular cause, you call it the opposite of what it is. We&#039;ve endured that legacy ever since. &amp;nbsp;    A relentless, decades-long&amp;nbsp;attack on worker  organizations  &amp;nbsp;   Union pay-scale tends to bring up all wages in a given area. If one company pays better, workers may be tempted to leave their non-union jobs to get the higher pay. Business owners know this, and some have united in the cause of destroying unions. They have one overriding&amp;nbsp;goal: higher profits for business owners and investors, accomplished&amp;nbsp;by reducing labor costs.  &amp;nbsp;   Critics of the decades-old campaign to drive down wages observe that &amp;ldquo;while the National Right to Work Committee purports to engage in grass-roots lobbying on behalf of the &#039;little guy&#039;, [it] was formed by a group of southern businessmen with the express purpose of fighting unions... they &#039;added a few workers for the purpose of public relations.&#039; ... The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation has received millions of dollars in grants from foundations controlled by major U.S. Industrialists...&amp;rdquo; [from Wikipedia] &amp;nbsp;   In their relentless drive toward lower wages, less safe working conditions, and diminished political power for working people throughout America, they have harnessed the deception model of politicking. But this campaign  isn&#039;t  just  deceptive; it is dishonest, opportunistic, and brutally relentless. </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CQkK</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CQkK/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:31:38 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CQkK</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQkK/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Creating a crime where none exists</title>
            <description> In 1961 Martin Luther King, Jr., addressed the very issue that Colorado voters will consider when they go to the polls on November 4. In 1961 (and by its proponents ever since), it was referred to as &amp;quot;right to work.&amp;quot; Today we call it simply &amp;quot;work for less.&amp;quot;    Dr. King observed ,    In our glorious fight for civil rights, we must guard against being fooled by false slogans, such as &#039;right to work.&#039; It is a law to rob us of our civil rights and job rights. It is supported by Southern segregationists who are trying to keep us from achieving our civil rights and our right of equal job opportunity. Its purpose is to destroy labor unions and the freedom of collective bargaining by which unions have improved wages and working conditions of everyone&amp;hellip;Wherever these laws have been passed, wages are lower, job opportunities are fewer and there are no civil rights. We do not intend to let them do this to us. We demand this fraud be stopped. Our weapon is our vote.   As we contemplate going to the polls this election, we must keep in mind that the longterm right wing agenda to drive down wages hasn&#039;t ended. Indeed, the proponents of Work For Less laws have crafted a constitutional change for Colorado that would throw people into jail for doing exactly what we (business owners and working people) do in Colorado every day. </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZBR</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZBR/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:11:11 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZBR</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZBR/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Colorado Amendment 47</title>
            <description> Johne at  SquareState  has  blogged  about how deceptive and injurious this amendment would be to Colorado&#039;s working people.  &amp;nbsp; </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZBj</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZBj/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:03:05 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZBj</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZBj/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>The lowest note in the veep debate</title>
            <description> Qwen Ifill asked both vice-presidential candidates about a situation in which the top of the ticket could no longer fulfill presidential responsibilities (i.e., incapacity or death.) Joe Biden spoke with gravity in his voice, talking first about what a tragedy that would be, and then promising to continue Barack Obama&#039;s policies. Governor Palin briefly agreed that it would be a tragedy and then discussed to what extent she would continue John McCain&#039;s policies. But there were two aspects of her response that were unsettling.  She was smiling  as she considered her own ascendancy to the presidency under such circumstances. And, she talked about the need to introduce Wasilla sensibilities to governance of the country.   While there is nothing wrong with the Wasilla comment per se, her expanding on the vision of her 72 year old running mate, who has had four bouts with cancer, could not have come at a worse time, in response to this very serious question. It suggests that she has thought about this, and she would be   too willing   to step into McCain&#039;s shoes.  Dana Milbank  also found Palin&#039;s response incongruous, if not jarring:   Asked about the possibility that she would assume the presidency if the president died in office, she found herself saying, &amp;quot;I think we need a little bit of reality from Wasilla Main Street there, brought to Washington, D.C.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;    It is all too convenient to argue that she   consciously   connected &amp;quot;we need&amp;quot; with the idea of McCane&#039;s demise. But could there be a subconscious thought process at work here?              Palin, 5 seconds into responding about a possible McCain death or incapacity             Palin, 9 seconds into a several-minutes-long response about a possible McCain death or incapacity -- was the smile insensitive? Does it suggest something about Palin&#039;s ambitions?   I&#039;ll be interested to hear what readers think about this. The only   innocent   explanation that i can think of for such light-heartedness while discussing McCain&#039;s possible illness or death, is that Governor Palin&#039;s response rambled a lot. She very briefly (six seconds) agreed with Biden&#039;s somber reaction; chatted about her differences (&amp;quot;a team of mavericks&amp;quot;) with McCain; returned for a moment to the possible reality of death; jumped immediately to the opportunity to bring Wasilla to Washington; then drew some distinctions between families and Washington.  Viewing the photo above, however -- and given the topic she was addressing -- it struck me as   too brief a period of solemnity  .   You&#039;re in a position to rise to the most powerful leadership position in the world, but you would do so at someone else&#039;s expense. Think about the implications of the question -- assassination, debilitating illlness, return of deadly cancer; then count off nine seconds to yourself -- and then ask yourself, would you have such a smile, so quickly? </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZGV</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZGV/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:20:32 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZGV</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZGV/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Palin blames a voter</title>
            <description> Petty.  The McCain Campaign is a lot of things, but i&#039;ve noticed something that, perhaps, no one else has picked up on -- a tendency to blame everyone,  including voters , for their problems.  Here (below the video) is one example.   &amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp; </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZM7</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZM7/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:51:12 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZM7</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>39</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZM7/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>What if the bailout would make things worse?</title>
            <description> Watching the news coverage of congress has been a  bit surreal. ALL OF THE NEWS COVERAGE that i&#039;ve watched today has automatically  assumed that the bailout is necessary to the welfare of the country. There has  been NO consideration given to those who either reject the bailout entirely, or  believe there may be better alternatives that have not been  explored. &amp;nbsp;   There&#039;s a significant element of blackmail in the  demand for a bailout.&amp;nbsp;None of us is in a position to know how much of the  bailout is hype, how much of it would be beneficial, and how much of the money would  disappear into thin air&amp;nbsp;without a trace, like the nine billion dollars that&amp;nbsp;the  Bush Administration lost&amp;nbsp;in Iraq. &amp;nbsp;   But consider this possibility: the Bush  Administration is leaving soon. They initially tried to get this bill passed  without any oversight whatsoever.  What if the bailout would make things  worse ? </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZMT</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZMT/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:09:57 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZMT</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>7</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZMT/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Fair, balanced, and ... censored?</title>
            <description> The article, apparently embarrassing to FoxNews, is titled,  Conservatives Begin Questioning Palin&amp;rsquo;s Heft . Scores of generated web links point to the article on the FoxNews website -- or rather, to the address where the article could once be found.  Because it is an AP article, i&#039;m not going to reproduce it here. (They&#039;re touchy about such practices.) But you can find it at this link:    http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/browse_thread/thread/da503176236efa28?pli=1     &amp;nbsp;I&#039;m not the only one who noticed. Discussion about the FoxNews story deletions can be found here:    http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/28/analysis-pressure-builds-palin-ahead-vp-debate/comments/      Brad Blog has the story:    http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6438     &amp;nbsp; </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZMD</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZMD/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:59:54 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZMD</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZMD/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Where was the media?</title>
            <description> Behold&amp;nbsp;the political  system,&amp;nbsp;stark and startling in the&amp;nbsp;glare of new media attention.  &amp;nbsp;   Consider these excerpts from   Newsweek:     &amp;nbsp;McCain&#039;s trust in [campaign manager  Rick Davis] was tested again amid disclosures that  Freddie Mac , the troubled mortgage giant that was recently placed  under federal conservatorship, paid his campaign manager&#039;s firm $15,000 a month  between 2006 and August 2008. As the mortgage crisis has escalated, almost any  association with Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae has become politically  toxic...  One senior McCain adviser said the  entire flap could have been avoided if the campaign had resisted attacking  Barack Obama for his ties to two former Fannie Mae executives, which prompted  the media to take a second look at Davis. &amp;quot;It was stupid,&amp;quot; the adviser said. &amp;quot;A  serious miscalculation and an amateurish move.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;    http://www.newsweek.com/id/161218  &amp;nbsp;   Let me get this straight. The McCain  Campaign attacked the Obama Campaign for close ties to a&amp;nbsp;critical&amp;nbsp;industry that  has now been bailed out by the government.  &amp;nbsp;   But the McCain Campaign had its own very  close ties to the same industry. And their  preferred solution to this embarrassment would have been to leave it all alone?  To just pretend when lobbyists are strategically positioned in the middle of campaigns for the highest elected office in the land, ideally poised to get government to go easy on their industry, that everything is OK so long as the story doesn&#039;t get out? &amp;nbsp;   I have a suggestion. Why don&#039;t we have a  conversation about the role of corporate&amp;nbsp;lobbyists doing our nation&#039;s political  business. And why don&#039;t we demand that the corporate media, which has long  failed in its mission to&amp;nbsp;cast&amp;nbsp;light&amp;nbsp;into the shadows, facilitate and promote  that discussion? </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZM2</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZM2/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:31:56 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZM2</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>8</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZM2/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Jack London&#039;s &quot;Revolution&quot;</title>
            <description>  (...about the Wall Street bailout...)    Jack London is famous for his dog stories. Few today know that he was a well-known socialist writer, or that his socialist views were shared (in his estimation) by seven million working class revolutionaries. Among the reasons London gave for embracing socialism, he wrote,    The capitalist class has managed society, and its management has failed. And not only has it failed in its management, but it has failed deplorably, ignobly, horribly. The capitalist class had an opportunity such as was vouchsafed no previous ruling class in the history of the world. It broke away from the rule of the old feudal aristocracy and made modern society. It mastered matter, organized the machinery of life, and made possible a wonderful era for mankind, wherein no creature should cry aloud because it had not enough to eat, and wherein for every child there would be opportunity for education, for intellectual and spiritual uplift. Matter being mastered, and the machinery of life organized, all this was possible. Here was the chance, God-given, and  the capitalist class failed .  It was blind and greedy . [emphasis added]   London wrote these words in the essay &amp;quot;Revolution,&amp;quot; published in 1909.&amp;nbsp; He described how, in response to such perceptions, those seven million working people signed their letters to each other, &amp;quot;yours for the revolution.&amp;quot;   Even as socialist political parties declined in the following decades, the basic tenets of socialist philosophy continued to animate American politics into the &#039;thirties, and left a significant imprint on Roosevelt&#039;s New Deal.  </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZML</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZML/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:18:49 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZML</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZML/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>McCain wins debate before it begins!</title>
            <description>  McCain Campaign called erratic, Conservatives criticize      The McCain Campaign has been described as erratic. This may be in part because this morning the McCain Campaign released ads declaring that McCain has won tonight&#039;s debate.         Four recent articles offer criticism of McCain or his ticket from people that you might expect should be supporting him.     One part of the McCain Campaign put out the above ad before the other part -- McCain himself -- had even announced that he would participate in the debate. This, against the backdrop of  one of his ex-advisers declaring  that &amp;quot;...his campaign is governed by tactics and not ideology...&amp;quot;     Pundits on cable TV have started calling John McCain a &amp;quot;drama queen.&amp;quot; I think that may be a sexist term, but i admit that it seems to capture my own impression of McCain&#039;s recent grandstanding. In fact, both the top and the bottom of the McCain-Palin ticket have been taking hits from their own presumed base.   While conservative commentator  George Will excoriated McCain , concluding that he had a &amp;quot;dismaying temperament&amp;quot; (and this was two days before he suspended his campaign and stood up the David Letterman Show), conservative columnist Kathleen Parker has  reluctantly concluded  that Sarah Palin is &amp;quot;out of her league&amp;quot; and should bow out.   Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal (long known as the blueblood paper of record for Republicans)  said that  McCain &amp;quot;gambled on a risky course... what Sen. McCain cast as a bipartisan, above-politics move, had descended into raw politics...&amp;quot; </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZMr</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZMr/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:10:39 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZMr</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZMr/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Unions and the Palin-McCain ticket</title>
            <description>  (about the   Palin-McCain ticket  )   When John McCain introduced Governor Palin, he introduced her as a former union member.   A  news article that reported McCain&#039;s introduction of Palin  observes,     At the sixth-annual Labor Day picnic in Memphis, Palin&#039;s  union ties didn&#039;t impress.   &amp;quot;She&#039;s anti-union and McCain is anti-union,&amp;quot; said Howard R. Richardson, 77, a retired senior vice president of the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union, one of the labor groups that voted to merge in 2004 form UNITE HERE.    She had two summer jobs  which may have given her a card in the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW). However, the IBEW is  on record supporting a different ticket .  </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjL</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjL/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:40:23 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjL</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>7</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZjL/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Sarah Palin, meet Westbrook Pegler</title>
            <description> Let us be charitable. Let us assume that Sarah Palin&#039;s participation in concocting the speech that she gave at the Republican National Convention was limited to reading it from the teleprompter, and perhaps cursory approval. To believe otherwise is to accuse her of something quite sinister -- the willful parroting of words of a racist who believed, and wrote, that fascism has its uses.   The quotation itself was innocuous and seemed non-controversial when it was spoken:&amp;nbsp;    &amp;ldquo;We grow good people in our small towns with honesty and sincerity and dignity&amp;rdquo;.    Was there an attempt to hide the authorship? Palin mentioned only that the words came from a &amp;quot;writer.&amp;quot; It wasn&#039;t long before bloggers identified the author of that passage. We might ponder how the words of such a bigot got into one of the main speeches at a major party convention.   Westbrook Pegler was a columnist who died in 1969. He is best remembered for cheering a lynching in California, for  advocating the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy , and  lamenting that during an assassination attempt of Franklin D. Roosevelt , it was &amp;quot;regrettable that Giuseppe Zangara hit the wrong man when he shot at Roosevelt in Miami.&amp;quot;  </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjr</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjr/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:17:42 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjr</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZjr/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Sarah Palin hacked: is she ready to govern?</title>
            <description> If the Palin-McCain ticket should win, Governor Palin will be the proverbial heartbeat away from owning the most powerful seat in the world. How competent is she?   Although it is fair to suggest that anyone can &amp;quot;get hacked&amp;quot;, Palin undoubtedly made herself a ripe target when it became public knowledge that she conducted official State of Alaska business from her Yahoo email account.  That account has been hacked .     The information found there, including official communications, was provided anonymously to a website called  Wikileaks . As i type this, that website has either been taken offline, or has become overloaded.   But the information also included personal information that will probably force all of Palin&#039;s contacts to change their email accounts. This includes the &amp;quot;First Dude&amp;quot;, Palin&#039;s husband (ek9wnr@something.com) and daughter Bristol (bristol_palin@something.com).&amp;nbsp;  Palin had previously been criticized for using Yahoo email as a means to avoid scrutiny. Yahoo  has never been considered a secure email service :   The practice [of using email services like Yahoo! for official business] is dangerous, said experts, and can run counter to laws ensuring government is open and accountable -- a tough point for Palin, who has made &amp;quot;open government&amp;quot; a catchphrase of her political identity...  Moreover, a hacked account could be used to falsify communications ... a point proven by one of the hackers, who used Palin&#039;s account to send a message to one of her assistants. &amp;nbsp;    We don&#039;t know whether Palin&#039;s account was hacked because she picked &amp;quot;lipstick&amp;quot; as her password,&amp;nbsp; or whether someone used a more sophisticated attack. But one must question the wisdom of someone putting government secrets at risk for the purpose of personal secrecy. How careful might she be with those nuclear codes?    Update:  Gawker has  copies of some Palin info  from her personal Yahoo account.    Update 2:  Breaking into Sarah Palin&#039;s webmail account was  a simple hack --one that required little to no technical expertise.  </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjc</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjc/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:30:45 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjc</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZjc/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Personalities and popularity</title>
            <description> &amp;quot;This election is not about issues,&amp;quot;  said McCain campaign manager Rick Davis .   Of course not. The McCain Campaign wants it to be about personalities.     Karl Rove long ago recognized that George W. Bush could be packaged. The Kennebunkport cowboy may be all hat, no cattle, but his aw-shucks brush-clearing personability probably did as much to win him two elections as anything else. It has been said that many voters would rather have a beer with Bush than with either Gore or Kerry. But W&#039;s current popularity attests to the fact that personality is a thin attribute on which to hang a reputation.  The practice of creating and sustaining a heroic personality for public consumption seems to have become a staple in the political trick bag. When it became necessary to defend the war in Afghanistan, the Bush Administration lionized Pat Tillman and lied about his death. In Iraq, Jessica Lynch was transformed from injured, helpless victim to female Rambo.&amp;nbsp;   Tillman and Lynch were not co-conspirators in the expropriation of their personal stories, unlike Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, who is intimately involved in the effort to construct her own favorable personna. The significant question must be, when will the public discover the extent to which  Palin&#039;s image has been conjured by the McCain Campaign ? Newsweek suggests that  her popularity is already subject to a reality check . Her favorables have slipped, her unfavorables have climbed. Stay tuned, this tracking poll may mark the beginning of a trend.  </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjZ</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjZ/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:06:55 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjZ</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZjZ/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>A narrative to get elected?</title>
            <description>  (updated)    The McCain Campaign has lied about the particulars of inexperienced but popular Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin&#039;s life in order to enhance her popularity. The McCain Campaign&#039;s half-truths, distortions, and outright lies have been well-documented in the   Washington Post  , the   New York Times  , and the   Los Angeles Times  .   McCain&#039;s strategy to get elected includes creating an image of Sarah Palin&#039;s &amp;quot;every-voter&amp;quot; credentials. At his very first introduction of Palin in Dayton, Ohio -- a state with a large unionized workforce --  just before Labor Day, McCain sought to burnish her kinship with working people, including the unsupported statement that Palin &amp;quot;was a union member&amp;quot;:      [excerpt] When Sen. John McCain on Friday announced Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his choice for vice president on the Republican ticket, McCain said Palin was a union member and is married to a union member.    Palin was associated with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, according to the McCain campaign, while her husband is a member of the United Steelworkers.    http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/sep/02/labor-picnic-serves-helping-of-politics/   &amp;quot;The person I am about to introduce was a union member...&amp;quot; --John McCain on video at 04:25 minute point:   http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-john-mccain-i_n_122401.html?view=screen    Transcript of McCain&#039;s introduction:   http://homernews.com/stories/082908/news_vp.shtml     &amp;nbsp; The story of Palin&#039;s union membership has since fallen into a media black hole. </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjS</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjS/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 13:51:21 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CZjS</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>43</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZjS/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Camp Casey at Regis University</title>
            <description> Students  at  Regis University  organized  Camp Casey on the Quad . It was  closed down  after an attack with water balloons, but the students are undaunted.  
 
Other events  are planned  for the coming week to protest the third anniversary of the war in Iraq.</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLln</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLln/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 13:25:12 MST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLln</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CLln/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Petitions for free speech rights</title>
            <description>Here are links to two petitions for free speech rights. 
 
Free speech appears to be in danger at Pace University. 
 
 www.petitiononline.com/paceuniv/petition.html  
 
And here&#039;s a petition supporting Jay Bennish, from folks who are critical of the Bush Administration. 
 
 worldcantwait.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1163&amp;Itemid=61#form </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLdv</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLdv/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:24:57 MST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLdv</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CLdv/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Jay Bennish, Vincent Carroll and the Ideological Struggle for our Schools</title>
            <description>Vincent Carroll, editorial page editor for the Rocky Mountain News, has  written , 
 
 [Overland High School teacher Jay] Bennish is the product of a teacher-training enterprise that on some campuses has slipped its moorings...  
 
Carroll explains, 
 
 The Chronicle of Higher Education documented this trend in a Dec. 15 article, noting that &quot;some education schools have begun questioning whether students value social justice, acknowledge white privilege, and agree to be change agents in battling sexism, racism and homophobia.&quot;   
 
The good editor continues, 
 
 Just last month, a public outcry forced Washington State University to revise a politically charged evaluation form for would-be teachers that had been used to identify and punish conservative leanings. One student who had refused to give the expected answers regarding &quot;the complexities of race, power, gender, class, sexual orientation, and privilege in American society&quot; was ordered to take sensitivity training or leave the program. Ed Swan refused to do either...  
 
So, is Ed Swan a mainstream hero who prompted this &quot;public outcry&quot;? Or is he perhaps an ideologue with an agenda?</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLdr</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLdr/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 13:47:11 MST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLdr</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CLdr/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Jay Bennish is one of many &quot;examples&quot; to be made</title>
            <description>A tenth grade teacher dreams of young citizens thinking for themselves. He challenges with provocative examples, yet asks them to form their own opinions.  
  
A student tapes twenty minutes of a lecture, a surreptitious gift to rightwing ideologues. Talk radio assassins target the teacher&#039;s character, calling in the white phosphorous on cherry-picked expressions. Brownshirts of the blogosphere explode with shrill indignation, spreading furor against a point of view about the nation, about  their leader , that differs from their own. They slam the teacher as a &quot;brainwasher,&quot; a &quot;dumbass,&quot; an &quot;idiot,&quot; a &quot;moonbat,&quot; a &quot;communist.&quot; 
 
The teacher is suspended, and in danger of expulsion. Where, one might inquire, is freedom of speech?</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLTP</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLTP/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 23:34:01 MST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/richardmyers/CLTP</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard Myers</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/d7a21bd1f5de483e15_fkshmvxwd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard Myers</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>471</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CLTP/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
      </channel>
</rss>