... or more aptly, ineptly trying;

The U.S. Census Bureau has provided population data on Arab-Americans to the Department of Homeland Security, including their ancestry and the cities and postal areas in which they live, The New York Times reported on Friday.

While the information sharing is legal, so long as the data do not identify individuals, civil liberties and Arab-American groups called it a breach of public trust and likened it to steps taken against Japanese-Americans in World War II, the newspaper said.


More College Republican whining.

To quote from Clinton's biography, the Colorado College Republican/ Jessica Peck Corry /David Horowitz platform is straight from the segregationist south of the early sixties:

You're good, decent, God-fearing people; "they're" threatening your way of life; you don't have to change, it's all their fault; elec me and I'll stand up for you just as you are and kick the hell out of them.

Since 9/11, American media and government have worked hard to portray us as tolerant and understanding of the substantial Muslim and Arab populations in the United States.

But with right wing xenophobic fearmonger propaganda (like this) being heaped on Middle America in this election year, it's not possible for these people to feel like they live in the same country:

Almost 60% of Arab Muslims living in the US fear for the future of their families, according to a new report.

The conclusions bear out what several Arab and Muslim groups have been saying since the 9/11 attacks.

Even when faced with discrimination and worse, these Arabs seem every bit as loyal as the native born -- reminds me of Japanese-Americans lining up in the internment camps to volunteer for service:

Yet - surprisingly, perhaps - just like the population as a whole, they are willing to trade part of their civil liberties if it stops terrorism.

Even so, over 40% of the general population would support the detention of Arabs and Muslims without the evidence to prosecute them.

... this one's particularly nasty;

"Black Conservative to Rebut NAACP Leader's Remarks in C-SPAN Interview," read the press release from Project 21, an organization of conservative African-Americans.

I had read in Reuters that Kweisi Mfume, president of the NAACP, had called groups like Project 21 "make-believe black organizations," and a "collection of black hustlers" who have adopted a conservative agenda in return for "a few bucks a head."

So I tuned into C-SPAN with interest to hear what a leading voice in the black conservative movement had to say.

...As the segment began there was an awkward Wizard of Oz moment as C-SPAN's Robb Harlston - himself black - turned to Project 21's Caucasian director, David Almasi, and said, "Um...Project 21... a program for conservative African Americans...you're not African American."

It was a remarkable moment. A flat tire had led to a nationally televised peek into what lies behind a murky network of interconnected black conservative organizations that seek ostensibly to bring more African-Americans into the conservative movement. But they're not just reaching out to the community. They also speak out publicly for conservative positions that might evoke charges of racism if advocated by whites.

...Almasi told me by phone that he is Project 21's only paid staffer, and that he works part-time.

...But Project 21 is a subsidiary of the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR), which, according to the liberal watchdog Mediatransparency.org, was formed in the 1980s to support Reagan's military interventions in Central America. NCPPR's leadership  president, vice president, executive director  are all white. Amy Ridenour, former Deputy Director of the College Republican National Committee and the organization's president, also sits on the board of Black America's PAC, an organization that claims to be nonpartisan but whose IRS filings state that its mission is to elect Republicans.

NCPPR's directors are also all white.


continued...

In fact, one of them  Jack Abramoff  is so white that he's actually a high-powered GOP lobbyist and Bush 'Pioneer' who, according to the Washington Post, is the target of multiple investigations into alleged funny-money payments from Indian gambling concerns (along with the $45 million in fees they collected from them, Abramoff and his partner Michael Scanlon convinced the tribes to donate large sums to conservative organizations run by Scanlon, which then funneled the money back to Abramoff, according to the Post).

In the 1990s, NCPPR got into the business of denying that climate change warnings were based on sound science. If the connection between black conservative outreach work and environmental skepticism doesn't seem clear, that's because it's not. But it's logical considering that ExxonMobil donated $30,000 to NCPPR for "educational activities" and $15,000 for general support in 2002, and last year they hiked their operating support to $25,000 and kicked in another $30,000 for NCPPR's 'EnviroTruth' website, according to company financial records.


... as reported in Time Magazine .... the paranoid running the country speak out;

Senator Wayne Allard, the main sponsor of the amendment, continued: "There is a master plan out there from those who want to destroy the institution of marriage." A master-plan? To destroy an institution gay couples merely want to join? In private, the rhetoric was even stronger. One of the leading religious right supporters of the president, James Dobson, wrote to his followers earlier this month: "Barring a miracle, the family as it has been known for more than five millennia will crumble, presaging the fall of Western civilization itself."

...The religious right has therefore achieved what they set out to achieve. The have used this issue to galvanize parts of the evangelical base, just as president Bush's political master-mind, Kark Rove, intended.

...The answer, alas, is that this president has decided it will help him politically to tear us apart. His base is restless over spending and Iraq, and this is a means to placate and energize them. If that means turning a tiny minority into a lethal threat to civilization, so be it. If that minority's sole crime is to seek to live up to the same responsibilities as everyone else, to uphold the family, to support responsibility, then that also is beside the point. In this battle, the president has shown his true colors. He is a divider, not a uniter.


Griego:

An icon in this city died Friday.

His name was Abelardo Barrientos Delgado. Everyone knew him as Lalo. He was a poet, a teacher, a gentleman. He was one of the rare few in this town who earned the right to be called a community leader. He dedicated his life to it, to us, Latinos, Chicanos, Mexicanos. ... ...


And,

"His name was synonymous with the Chicano movement," said longtime friend Ricardo LaFore, director of U.S. Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell's Denver office.

"Lalo's name is a thread that runs through the women's movement, the children's rights movement, through the entire human rights movement."


His most famous work:

stupid america, see that chicano

with a big knife

in his steady hand

he doesn't want to knife you

he wants to sit on a bench

and carve christfigures

but you won't let him.

stupid america, hear that chicano

shouting curses on the street

he is a poet

without paper and pencil

and since he cannot write

he will explode.

stupid america, remember that chicanito

flunking math and english

he is the picasso

of your western states

but he will die

with one thousand masterpieces

hanging only from his mind.

- Abelardo Barrientos Delgado, 1969



Post:

...Just when we thought the gay marriage debate couldn't get any more offensive ...

The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives outdid itself this past week by passing a make-believe bill that would strip the federal courts of jurisdiction over same-sex marriage cases.

...In reality, it was a political maneuver to polarize the fall campaign.

Set aside the social and moral implications of the gay marriage argument for a moment, if you will, and look at this bill at face value: Do we want Congress to tell the U.S. Supreme Court what it can or cannot review? What system of government is that? Lawmakers are attempting to rig the separation of powers and unbalance the three branches of government.

...It's preposterous. And don't expect any common sense on this issue from Colorado's Republican delegation. All five - Reps. Bob Beauprez, Joel Hefley, Scott McInnis, Marilyn Musgrave and Tom Tancredo - voted for this bill.


Redistricting and, of course, social legislation of all kinds -- votes and the will of the people don't matter when you're on a jihad...

Gay-marriage foes bring forth new bill in House

Musgrave must be worried that the $2.5 million she's already raised with her hate legislation won't be enough...

The activist right-wing's bill would prohibit courts from reviewing legislation on the issue. Really;

"This is about as unconstitutional as you can get," said Christopher Anders, legislation counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. The bill proposes to bar federal courts from ruling on the constitutionality of a 1996 congressional act declaring marriage the union of a man and a woman.

Our stalwart representatives?

"I think it's a prudent step...," said Rep. Bob Beauprez, R-Colo., who said he supports the bill.

In last week's battle in its War on Women, the Bushies announced they're withholding $34 million from the UN's population programs for the third year in a row.

The result of which will be that thousands more sub-Saharan women die, and that thousands more Chinese girls are sterilized.

Tim Wirth, the former United States senator from Colorado who now directs the United Nations Foundation, a private organization that supports United Nations activities, said the Bush administration had isolated itself from the international community. No other nation has withheld contributions over the China issue, and some, like the Netherlands, have increased donations to compensate for the American reduction of funds. "The administration has once again embarrassed the United States," Mr. Wirth said.

... from the Post after devoting the second year of his useless term to channelling the focus to divide the country by writing discrimination in the Constitution.

Allard Moves Into Spotlight in Second Term

From worthless;

In his first term, Allard had worked mostly behind the scenes on Capitol Hill. He was hardly a star on the national or even the local level.

... to a performance the Post should have editorialized under the title, 'Shame';

The bill ultimately died on the Senate floor. But Allard claimed victory, saying he'd gotten more supporters than anticipated. He quoted Revolutionary War naval hero John Paul Jones, vowing to continue his fight.

This was all about pandering, fund-raising, and hate. That's ALL that Allard has brought to Colorado.

But this is a scary prospect for a way-right special-interest veterinarian;

Allard has a good chance of becoming chairman of the Senate Budget Committee next year if the Republicans retain control of the chamber.

Well, neo-con wannabe (new term: "neo-con-a-be"), more like it.

Bill Owens' minute 36 seconds of video fame debating Howard Dean at the ACLU 2004 conference in San Francisco is online (click on the 'archived webcast' link).

Good thing the Governor doesn't have any work to do back home on, say fiscal reform;

Owens opposes the initiatives supported by such groups as the chambers of commerce, economic development groups, the Colorado Children's Campaign and nonprofits such as the Bell Policy Center and the Bighorn Center for Public Policy.

New revelations out of the CU football program would make John 'it's the floozie's fault' Andrews proudưa lesson on how things are done via the ole boy network:

A University of Colorado campus police detective, in a sometimes tearful statement, said that top football officials pressured his department to treat misbehaving football players more leniently than other students.

What does this mean? Only what we already know about; that is, a program full of pampered guys who felt, from the roughing up of parking attendants to the booze and hookers (and maybe some girls who were not consenting), above the system...

...is his fascinating, seemingly intentional, suicidal alienation of the NAACP.

In the LA Times:

Why on earth not? Bush's decision to boycott the NAACP is inexplicable as a matter of presidential leadership. And it is just as inexplicable as a matter of low, self-interested politics. We would accuse him of ulterior motives, but it is hard to think of any.

Middle AmericaưAdrian, MI:

Bush is the first president not to speak to the NAACP convention since the 1930s. Why would Bush go out of his way to alienate black voters, just months before the election? Even if Bush is correct, and the NAACP has treated him badly, he's supposed to work to unite Americans, not hold his breath until every sector of the American public blindly falls in line.

Make no mistake, this poorly thought out move is changing the whole debateưand chipping away at the perilous balance behind Mike Littwin's sense of polarization in America today:

Julian Bond, the N.A.A.C.P. chairman, said the Republicans' "idea of equal rights is the American flag and Confederate swastika flying side by side."

Mr. Bond repeated the criticism in a speech on Sunday, saying Republicans "preach racial neutrality and practice racial division.''

Either way, there's pretty much no outcome here that doesn't cost `em big...

Why did Allard and Musgrave waste our time with their divisive wedgie campaign?  Musgrave's $2 mill fund-raising jihad might just be the answer..

He isn't buying the FMA-culture war madrasa party line:

"The constitutional amendment we're debating today strikes me as antithetical in every way to the core philosophy of Republicans," McCain said. "It usurps from the states a fundamental authority they have always possessed and imposes a federal remedy for a problem that most states do not believe confronts them."

And CNN actually puts this one together (for a change):

Bush, who defeated McCain for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000, has championed the amendment, saying it is necessary to defend the institution of marriage from "activist judges."

McCain has always represented the more sensible wing of the Republican Party. Perhaps they are demonstrating their fatigue with the evangelical zealots that own their party today?

Either way:

The proposed amendment will likely die Wednesday in the Senate if GOP leaders cannot muster the 60 votes needed to overcome a procedural hurdle that would allow them to move it to the floor. With most Democrats and a number of moderate Republicans opposed, clearing that hurdle is considered unlikely.

Fitting to see the right-wing squabbling over whether it's better to discriminate or to deface the Constitution;

A White House-backed drive to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex marriage headed toward an election-year defeat on Capitol Hill on Wednesday.

What a political, divisive waste of America's time...

The Senate dealt an election-year defeat Wednesday to a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, rejecting pleas from President Bush and fellow conservatives that the measure was needed to safeguard an institution that has flourished for thousands of years.

The vote was 48-50, 12 short of the 60 needed to keep the measure alive.


The Federal Republican Majority Protection Amendment fails... activist majoriterrorists in a funk ...

Can you believe that the Musgrave/Allard fatwa is dominating the Senate debate this week?

Of course you can! It's Imam Bush and the Ashcrofts, singing "I will divide..."

People for the American Way has an action campaign you should access right now.

There is no "moderate" way to write discrimination into the Constitution.


There is no "respectful" way to amend the Constitution to permanently assign one group of Americans to second-class citizenship.


There is no "compassionate" way to deny the children of gay parents the stability and legal protections that can only be offered by marriage.


Give Allard and Campbell the love...

New York Times:

Experts in Sex Field Say Conservatives Interfere With Health and Research

...or years, Advocates for Youth, a Washington-based organization devoted to adolescent sexual health, says, it received government grants without much trouble. Then last year it was subjected to three federal reviews.

..."For 20 years, it was about health and science, and now we have a political ideological approach," he said. "Never have we experienced a climate of intimidation and censorship as we have today."




Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account

Start Blogging










Anne Zook
Chaotic Utopia
Civic Satisfaction
CJ's Bullhorn
Coyote Gulch
Colorado Comments
Colorado Confidential
Colorado Pols
Coloradolib
Colorado Media Matters
Curious Stranger
DemNotes
Democracy for Colorado
Democracy in Progress
Empires Fall
Environment Colorado
Coloradans for Fairness and Equality
Four Seasons
Janus Online
JB Holston
Liberal Church Nerd
Mile High Delphi
NatureBlog
New West Boulder
Nic and the City
Oak Creek Forum
RockyWatch
SquareState.net
Stygius
They Get Letters
Tom Tancredo Watch
Unbossed
Vestal Vespa
Wash Park Prophet


African-American Political Pundit
AmericaBLOG
American Prospect
Antiwar.com
Billmon
Blog for America
BRAD Blog
BuzzFlash
Campus Progress
CommonBits
Common Cause Blog
Common Dreams
Crooks and Liars
Daily Kos
David Sirota
DU
Digby
EchoDitto
Eschaton
Gadflyer
Huffington Post
Media Matters
Matthew Gross
MoJo Blog
MoveOn ActionForum
MyDD
NDN Blog
NewsHounds
Of, By and For
O'Franken Factor
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Raw Story
Street Prophets
Talking Points Memo
TPM Cafe
TalkLeft
Think Progress
Truthout Blog
Wonkette