<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
     xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:ysrv="http://www.progressnowaction.org">
  <channel>
    <title>Posts in the category Budget Priorities</title>
    <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/category_rss/budgetpriorities</link>
    <description></description>
                        <item>
            <title>More Evidence of &quot;Bushies&quot; Burrowing</title>
            <description> For several years now the evidence of the Alberto Gonzales gang&#039;s manipulation of the Federal Civil Service within the Department of Justice has been well publicized. The fact that right-wing political ideologues were being approved for career professional positions based on social issue orthodoxy, rather than competence and qualifications, is yet another blight on the scandalous legacy of the current occupant of the White House.  Today&#039;s report in the Washington Post reveals that this practice of burrowing right-wing political operatives into the Civil Service is also in-place in the scientific agencies. Perhaps this is the mis-administration&#039;s strategy for making permanent the Republican obsession for combating the truth of science with their twisted political and social priorities.  The Center for Public Integrity is soon to release their &amp;quot;Broken Government&amp;quot; study. The fund-raising teaser release promises 120 specific cases. This kind of investigative effort to hold the Bushies accountable as the mis-administration fades into oblivion is crucial.&amp;nbsp; Revealing and acting on the depth and breadth of this conspiracy is vital to the success of any reforms and corrects to the offenses of the past eight years.  The Obama-Biden Administration will be stretched and tested to uncover and flush-out these right-wing activists who have burrowed their way into the Civil Service like so many termites. The evidence of these infestations must be met with quick action.  Executive appointees selected for positions above these people must be prepared to take every possible action within the laws and regulations of the Civil Service structure to either get them dismissed, or make it too hard for them to stay and accomplish their nefarious goals. Attention to the selection of the Administrator of the Office of Personnel Management will be a key to success in this area.  Various Executive agency inspectors general must be supported in investigating these political opportunists. IF they are found to be substantially unqualified for the job description that they were hired to fill, then it should be clear grounds for dismissal as an unlawful appointment.  The Obama-Biden appointees who are saddled with these burdens must enforce clear, precise and enforceable performance standards. When confronted with qualitative requirements to enforce and perform based upon laws and regulations that these infiltrators are likely to hold ambitions to undermine and avoid, could more easily force them to resign.  Even in its demise the minions of the current mis-administration are appearing to be increasingly unwilling to follow the current occupant of the White House and the vice out of Washington. This certainly adds to the challenge and urgency of establishing the new administration&#039;s executive leadership. Too many months and too many acting, caretaker, leaders in the executive departments will make it all the harder to untangle the tentacles of the Bush parasites. </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQDn</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQDn/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:53:14 MST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQDn</guid>
            <dc:creator>Ralph T</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/22970b0cb82ab5861b_e6yymv1de.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Ralph T</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQDn/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Green Jobs Now</title>
            <description>Comments by Nelson Bock, of Colorado Interfaith Power and Light, on the need to support green jobs in a renewable energy economy. 
 
I am pleased to represent Colorado Interfaith Power and Light, and the IPL movement which now has affiliates in 28 states, and whose mission is to mobilize the religious community to respond to the threat of climate change.  I am here to support green jobs in a new energy economy, because it is our conviction that green jobs is not just an economic issue, and not just an environmental issue,  but that it is also a profoundly spiritual issue. The earth, our home, is a sacred gift, the care of which we have been entrusted, and on which we live in a web of interdependent relationships.  Living with reverence for that gift and those relationships is at the core of spirituality, and also the key to our survival and health as a human family.  This is an issue that connects the health of our planet, the health of our people, and the health of our economy, because those things are all intrinsically connected in the larger scheme of things  
 
The earth, our home, is in peril because of our excessive dependence on the fossil fuel economy we have built over the last two hundred years.  Climate change, accelerated and exacerbated by greenhouse gases accumulating in the atmosphere as a result of human activity, threatens to severely disrupt the ecological balance which has supported human life, and the life of millions of other species with whom we share the earth.  At the same time, human health is threatened by the emission of many other pollutants which foul not just the air, but the water and the land on which we likewise depend.  And the health of our communities is threatened by economic dislocation and by the environmental destruction of public lands caused by ever more rapacious activities necessitated by the drive to seek and extract the last drops of fossil fuels wherever they may be found.  These activities do not just damage landscape and wildlife habitat; they damage our spirits, as they increasingly estrange us from the earth, which we treat not as a living system of which we are a part, but as an inert depository of raw materials and a convenient repository for our waste.  Further, these activities estrange us from one another, as exploitation of the earth&#039;s resources is based on exploitation of people and communities whose environment is despoiled and whose labor is treated as just another commodity, and who are then left to deal with the economic and environmental fallout when the resources are depleted. 
 
What we are learning is that a healthy society--one in which people and communities are healthy and happy and secure-- is dependent on a healthy relationship to our environment.  Yes, people need jobs, and that is why we are here today.  But a job is not just a job.  Work is an expression of the human spirit.  The work we do also shapes our spirit, making us more or less healthy as we embody our relationship to the earth through our work.  So what kind of jobs are going to give us healthy people, a healthy economy, and healthy communities?  The kinds of jobs which preserve a healthy planet.  Jobs which discover, create, and utilize renewable sources of energy, jobs which help us to conserve the earth&#039;s finite and precious resources.  Jobs which are based on sustainable sources of energy and other natural resources. Jobs which create and promote alternative forms of transportation.  Jobs which allow communities to be more self-sustaining and less dependent on global supply lines and the exploitation of the labor and resources of people from other parts of the world.  Jobs which allow people to express and take pride in the dignity of their labor through a reverent and respectful use of the earth&#039;s resources, and which provide families with a living wage.  
 
So we want to urge the people of Colorado and the United States to support candidates, initiatives, and policies which move us away from our unhealthy reliance on fossil fuels and towards green jobs in a green economy, for the health of our people, our communities, and our planet.</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/nbock6552/CQDS</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/nbock6552/CQDS/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:24:51 MST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/nbock6552/CQDS</guid>
            <dc:creator>Nelson Bock</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/4b519578d91f18752b_efm6b4e7n.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Nelson Bock</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQDS/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Why Not a &quot;Bailout&quot; that Restructures Health Care to Benefit All?</title>
            <description> Failed U.S. health care is a major contributor&amp;nbsp;to our systemic economic crisis. Indeed, the excesses of Wall St. and the subprime mortgage catastrophe mirror  U.S. health care policy &amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; both are typified by privatized profit (for investors and insurers), and socialized risk (for taxpayers and consumers). Inflated U.S. health care costs &amp;ndash; 16% of GDP and rising &amp;ndash; are major contributors to an inflationary economy. Redress of this single aspect of an out-of-control U.S. economy would lift all boats. Comprehensive health care reform would improve the economic status of all, relieving health access concerns of families, individuals and businesses, large and small.   So-called &amp;quot;legacy costs&amp;quot; alone, comprised largely of retiree health and pension benefits, have contributed significantly to General Motor&amp;rsquo;s negative cash flow, prompting yet another request for government bailout. In 2005, costs of health care coverage to GM amounted to $5.6 billion for 1.1 million employees, retirees and their dependents. In 2005   BusinessWeek   reported that legacy costs added $1,600 to the cost of each GM vehicle.  It&amp;rsquo;s time to confront the crippling economic effects of employment-linked health coverage that reduces competitiveness of businesses in the world marketplace, reduces effective employee take-home pay, and adds to the costs paid by all for goods and services (note above cost added to each U.S. -made car). State and city budgets, too,&amp;nbsp;are depleted by&amp;nbsp;escalating health costs&amp;nbsp;for employees and retirees.  Progressives leaders must do a better job of promoting civic discourse while clearly defining issues, like health care reform. Democrats&amp;nbsp;shoud cease parroting right-wing framing and code words intended to distort the issue, e.g., &amp;quot;government health care&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;socialized medicine,&amp;quot; as a couple of recent Colorado candidates have done.&amp;nbsp;We need to&amp;nbsp;refute Republican &amp;quot;free-market&amp;quot; advocacy that treats health care as a commodity to be exploited for maximum profit, with top-skimming of  over 25% of health care dollars  for private insurance shareholder profits, CEO salaries, excessive administrative costs, marketing, lobbying, etc. &amp;quot;Free-market&amp;quot; health care is as perverse an incentive as free-market police and fire protection would be, leaving everyone vulnerable, at the mercy of the marketplace.  Barack Obama showed promise&amp;nbsp;broaching issues during the campaign. He made a start at explaining the  high cost of privatizing Medicare  (13% higher than traditional Medicare), and the failure of Medicare prescription drug reform that prohibits negotiation of bulk drug rates, as the VA does to save money. The 2003 reform was a giveaway to insurance and pharmaceutical lobbies, with billions of dollars of taxpayer subsidies and inflated costs to benefit their bottom lines. Now is the time to make the case for an improved Medicare for All - a public insurance with true free choice of providers and hospitals. By contrast, for-profit insurance choices are narrowly limited to &amp;quot;in-plan&amp;quot; providers, necessitating change of providers with change of insurance.  Comprehensive health care reform&amp;nbsp;shoud be&amp;nbsp;part of a broad economic remedy. U.S. health costs are almost double those of all other industrialized nations, and growing; yet we still experience worse overall health outcomes. Increasing numbers of underinsured pay escalating costs for decreasing coverage. Taxpayers currently pay for over 60% of health care costs, including 70% of legislators&amp;rsquo; health coverage. By many accounts, that is enough to provide single-risk-pool coverage for all.  In fact, single-payer health care is the only model of reform that has demonstrated in  over 20 federal and state studies  the capacity to save money and provide comprehensive coverage for all.  It is time for reform that benefits the worker as well as the CEO.  First posted on  Huffington Post  11-13-08 </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/micheleswenson/CQDV</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/micheleswenson/CQDV/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:33:24 MST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/micheleswenson/CQDV</guid>
            <dc:creator>Michele S</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Michele S</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQDV/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Talkingpointsmemo hiring again!</title>
            <description>Josh Marshall: 
 
No, don&#039;t fret, we&#039;re not reorganizing as a bank holding company to access TARP funds. And relative to a lot of other companies our finances are holding up well. But we are considering funding our own micro-bailout ... well, maybe nano-bailout, of one small sliver of the financial services industry.  
 
What am I talking about? We&#039;re considering hiring a business and finance reporter-blogger. As you&#039;d probably figure, we&#039;re not looking to gin up a TPM version of Squawk Box or have some slicked-back-haired right-winger ranting about zeroing out the capital gains tax or yelling about how undervalued the financial sector stocks are. And business and finance news wasn&#039;t something I&#039;d really imagined TPM getting into. But we&#039;re already making plans to shift a lot of our TPMmuckraker.com resources to muckraking the financial collapse, the resultant bailout and all the shenanigans and self-dealing and new lobbying gambits. One of the things I most prize about TPM is that we&#039;ve been able to stay nimble and light enough to be able to focus our resources on where the story is. And there&#039;s no getting around the fact that this is now where the story is.</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/kennethdebacker/CQDM</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/kennethdebacker/CQDM/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:44:05 MST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/kennethdebacker/CQDM</guid>
            <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Ken</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQDM/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Date Set to Leave Iraq</title>
            <description>The American Ambassador to Iraq and the Iraqi Foreign Minister have signed an agreement requiring US Forces to leave Iraq.  No, this isn&#039;t another predictive &quot;dream&quot; story of the pending Obama Administration; the Bushies did (or, allowed) this. 
 
So much for all of the GOP talking points and faux news air-time devoted to &quot;...no arbitrary deadlines.&quot;  The current news sound-bites are full of controversy and contradiction from inside Iraq.  But, the American conservatives are being surprisingly quiet.</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQzp</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQzp/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:47:59 MST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQzp</guid>
            <dc:creator>Ralph T</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/22970b0cb82ab5861b_e6yymv1de.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Ralph T</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQzp/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>So ya say ya want a revolution....Well, ya know - We all Want to Change the World....JUST Another Day In Paradise - The Rantings of a Mad Woman</title>
            <description>   OBAMA CITY, JAPAN  : &amp;nbsp;Banners on parade and dancing in the streets with shouts in English &amp;quot;YES WE CAN&amp;quot;     KENYA:&amp;nbsp;   Dancing in the streets - 2 days of national holiday declared amid chants of &amp;quot;YES WE CAN&amp;quot;     FRANCE:   &amp;nbsp;People pour into the streets of Paris amid dancing and singing there are shouts &amp;quot;YES WE CAN&amp;quot;     LONDON, SOUTH AFRICA....ALL OVER THE WORLD:   The REVOLUTION has been legitimized, accepted and praised.    &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; WE actually won the 2nd revolution for the United States of America.   </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CQ88</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CQ88/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:26:59 MST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CQ88</guid>
            <dc:creator>The Mad Woman</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/fcb34917d9fd3e3809_u806mvulr.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>The Mad Woman</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQ88/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>The “Socialist” meme is really about racism</title>
            <description>The attacks by the McCain campaign, accusing Obama of being a Socialist, sound like a reversion back to something from the 1950s.  That is the way the media portrays it, as an amusing and ridiculous jab being made by a desperate campaign that is on the ropes with nothing better to offer.  Even Obama&#039;s dismissive response about sharing his toys as a child seems to regard it that way.   
 
But the attack is much more insidious and subtle than that.  The fact that it is being rolled out in the last week of the campaign suggests to me that the Republicans think that this is the most powerful shot left in their arsenal, and could be the game-changer they rely on to win the election at the last minute.  
 
As McPalin describe it, the socialist accusation is a claim that Obama will take &quot;your&quot; hard earned money and give it to &quot;them.&quot;  Given the demographics of the group that is being targeted with this pitch - blue collar and middle class whites - it is not hard to see who &quot;they&quot; are.  
 
Just as George H.W Bush&#039;s Willie Horton ads were not about crime, and Ronald Reagan&#039;s railing on about welfare Cadillacs was not about welfare reform, this socialist line is not about economics or even ideology.   Nor is it about painting Obama as outside the main stream.   
 
It is all about stoking the residual and ill- concealed racism that remains a powerful factor in America.  It is designed to evoke  stereotypes of lazy, shiftless, unemployed blacks in the south and Midwest, drunk Indians in the southwest, and illegal immigrants in big sombreros sleeping in the sun, all supported by the welfare funds taken from &quot;your&quot; hard earned dollars.  The campaign is brilliantly indirect, but it is the nastiest attack yet on Obama.  It is the McCain campaign playing the race card. 
 
Maybe it is right for us to treat the attack as a throwback to McCarthyism that merely reflects on the age of McCain.  Maybe the attack is too subtle and the American people too dumb to respond as the Republicans intend.  Maybe America is not as racist as they think.  Maybe the fall of communism makes the whole thing irrelevant.  But the Republicans would not be rolling it out as their dying gasp of the campaign if they believed that.</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/bullwinkle/CQ8r</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/bullwinkle/CQ8r/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:29:37 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/bullwinkle/CQ8r</guid>
            <dc:creator>Doc Martin</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Doc Martin</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQ8r/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Just Another Day In Paradise.....Bush, McCain &amp; Reagan - triplets of the economic horror show...BOO! - Rantings of a Mad Woman</title>
            <description> The McCain Campaign is out answering the internet blogosphere again.   A continuation of the policy of smoke and mirrors...     &amp;quot;SO, Mr. McCain, what about the Economy?&amp;quot;    &amp;nbsp;  &amp;quot;uh, uh, HEY! Look over here...Obama stubbed his toe and he didn&#039;t bleed - proves he&#039;s a vampire!!! 
Afterall,we knew he had to be...    He runs with alien terrorists from MARS!!!!!    The Washington Post has films of the landing and met with their leader.....    We are demanding right here and now....RELEASE THE FILM!!!!!&amp;quot;    YES  McCAIN  and  his Campaign  are LIKE  BUSH  in one major way...   They will SAY anything (LIE); They think WE are STUPID; And when all else fails, blame the Democrats!  </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CQ8Z</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CQ8Z/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:15:10 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CQ8Z</guid>
            <dc:creator>The Mad Woman</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/fcb34917d9fd3e3809_u806mvulr.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>The Mad Woman</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>271</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQ8Z/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Wrong on Water Bob</title>
            <description> Bob Schaffer&#039;s out of touch, wrong on critical issues rap-sheet grows by the day. I found this latest charge in Ed Quillen&#039;s column in the Sunday Denver Post.   Read the whole column online at  http://www.denverpost.com/quillen/ci_10799075   or scroll down to the extended post text.  The Referendum A test still carries a lot of weight with me.&amp;nbsp; Once again here&#039;s a case where&amp;nbsp;Bob Schaffer sided with big-monied interests and against Colorado farmers, ranchers and communities.  Hopefully, he&#039;ll be sliding into the dustbin of Colorado political history by 10:00 PM on November 4th.&amp;nbsp; Being too cozy with the &amp;quot;drill baby, drill&amp;quot; crowd of oilies is bad enough, but working on the wrong side of water policy is unforgiveable.  PS - If you get a chance, drop a complimentary email to Ed (his email link at at the end of the Extended Post Text).&amp;nbsp; It is so hard to find something worthy of praise in the Denver Post these days that we should encourage Ed to continue his good work. </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQ8p</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQ8p/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:59:31 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQ8p</guid>
            <dc:creator>Ralph T</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/22970b0cb82ab5861b_e6yymv1de.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Ralph T</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQ8p/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Being the Future - Obama in Fort Collins</title>
            <description> Reports are coming in that Barack Obama&#039;s Colorado appearances today were record breaking. One Democratic Party insider says that the Denver Rally pulled in over 100,000 supporters.  I was within a softball toss of Barack in Fort Collins. One early estimate claims 45,000 attended; it sure looked like a lot more than that to me.&amp;nbsp; The Eastern half of the CSU Oval was filled with people, and more were crowded into the Southwest quarter of the Oval.  If I were priviledged enough...I would paste in one of my low-res pictures of the crowd.&amp;nbsp; But, even Barack said that the setting was incredible.&amp;nbsp; The trees surrounding the Oval were in full color.  Barack&#039;s message has evolved, even from the acceptance speach at Mile High.&amp;nbsp; Focused, positive and thoroughly inspiring.  I was struck by several uses of &amp;quot;the future&amp;quot; today.&amp;nbsp; Each time was full of hope and desire for the best for all Americans.&amp;nbsp; Barack&#039;s comments were on-target for a number of topics:&amp;nbsp; the economy, healthcare, primary education, secondary education, jobs and how John McCain is out of touch.  The program started with a prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance and an a capella performance&amp;nbsp;of the National Anthem.&amp;nbsp; Betsy Markey gave one of her best speaches as did Governor Bill Ritter.  Other news organizations will have a full transcript of the speach.&amp;nbsp; The press contingent was impressive.&amp;nbsp; But, news coverag does not compare to being there...being there to see the future President. </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQ8V</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQ8V/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:40:01 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CQ8V</guid>
            <dc:creator>Ralph T</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/22970b0cb82ab5861b_e6yymv1de.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Ralph T</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CQ8V/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Threat of More of the McSame</title>
            <description>I was just listening to former Virginia Governor Douglas Wilder on a radio show.  He made a critical and brilliant observation about John McCain. 
 
His evaluation of the Sarah Palin selection rests on that decision as an indicator of how McSame would later decide on the people to fill the other leadership positions in a supposed McSame mis-administration.  This is a powerful indictment of a candidate for president of the US when the nation so despirately needs a clear change of direction. 
 
The specter of Sarah Palin equivalent appointments throughout the US Executive Branch shows no chance of reforming, and certainly not reversing, the criminal excesses of the past seven years.  There will be no resolution to the US Attorney firings, and little hope of removing the fraudulently hired radical right-wingers who have been peppered throughout the Department of Justice to undermine, rather than enforce, the law. 
 
This demonstrated decision-making pattern by John McCain is a screaming warning to America.  No other fact shines so brightly than the selection of Sarah Palin to confirm that McSame is the incarnation of a third, and perhaps more devastating, term for the G.W. Bush policies. 
 
Considering everything you find important, think your retired relatives who will be hurt if McCain succeeds and leads America down the path of more for the wealthiest and less for the rest.  Victory in the race for the White House is critical, but top to bottom electoral victories on the ballot is equally important for our communities and state.</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CZB9</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CZB9/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:22:03 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CZB9</guid>
            <dc:creator>Ralph T</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/22970b0cb82ab5861b_e6yymv1de.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Ralph T</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZB9/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Crash</title>
            <description> This was not the one-word headline I expected to see in this morning&#039;s Foreign Policy magazine Morning Brief email.&amp;nbsp; Similarly, the Financial Times brought gloomy articles confirming the depth of the current fiscal decline. &amp;nbsp;   &amp;quot;Falling by more than 20 percent over seven straight trading days, the U.S. stock market&#039;s recent performance now meets the standard definition of a crash.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;  - FP Morning Brief, 10 October 2008 &amp;nbsp;  this is the first attention grabbing fact from FP.&amp;nbsp; Realistically a seven point consecutively repeated 20% downward trend line is what I&#039;ve always called a &amp;quot;death-slide.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp;  It&#039;s a very effective way to get the attention of executive decision-makers and mid-level managers.&amp;nbsp; I&#039;ve seen motivation and attention to detail factors show a marked increase. &amp;nbsp;     &amp;quot;Investors have lost an estimated $8.4 trillion dollars so far this year, with the Dow Jones industrial average sinking another 678 points or 7.3 percent Thursday.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;  - FP Morning Brief, 10 October 2008&amp;nbsp;    My proposal is to add this figure to the existing National Debt burden enacted by the current occupant of the White House.&amp;nbsp; In addition to being a condemning legacy of this presidency, it should be a lesson in who, and how, to elect the next president. &amp;nbsp;  Personally, I&#039;m watching the value of my supposedly solid Federal employee Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) account in a similar decline.&amp;nbsp; Holding a large percentage of my shares in a Standard &amp;amp; Poors 500 fund isn&amp;rsquo;t such a happy place at the moment. </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CZBF</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CZBF/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:22:20 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CZBF</guid>
            <dc:creator>Ralph T</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/22970b0cb82ab5861b_e6yymv1de.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Ralph T</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZBF/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Disney works the Debate,....The New Generation of Animatronics...Just Another Day in Paradise - The Rantings of A Mad Woman</title>
            <description>Either Disney has gone to a new generation of Animatronics or we now have proof of pod people taking over the country........ 
 
Is SARAH PALIN For real?</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CZGh</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CZGh/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:21:26 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CZGh</guid>
            <dc:creator>The Mad Woman</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/fcb34917d9fd3e3809_u806mvulr.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>The Mad Woman</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZGh/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>The blockbuster story today!</title>
            <description> Just last week, Gov. Bill Owens [Ritter- My mistake as noted by Kevlar Liberal] has imposed a state hiring and new construction freeze.&amp;nbsp; Raj Chohan, via AP,  reports :     Saying uncertain economic times require tough measures, Gov. Bill Ritter on Thursday announced a freeze on hiring new state employees and ordered a halt to new construction....   Today Jim Christie, Reuters News,  reports :   SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -  California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has told Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson that the most populous U.S. state may need to turn to the federal government for short-term financing because a $7 billion sale of notes may be foiled by weak credit markets...    &amp;quot;The economic fallout from this national credit crisis continues to drain state tax coffers, making it even more difficult to weather the continuation of frozen credit markets for any length of time,&amp;quot; Schwarzenegger said, adding he supports a federal emergency financial rescue plan.   California State Treasurer Bill Lockyer said on Wednesday the planned note sale was at risk from the uncertainty gripping financial markets and the lack of a response to it by the U.S. government.   &amp;quot;Basically no credit is available -- zero today,&amp;quot; the treasurer of the biggest U.S. issuer of municipal debt told Reuters in a telephone interview....   Sean Paul Kelly, The Agonist,  writes :  Look, if the States can&#039;t function we&#039;re all hosed. And the so-called Congressional bailout does nothing to address these issues. It&#039;s not even remotely close to a &#039;clear resolution.&#039; Even Krugman says as much,  &amp;quot;Aid to cash-strapped state and local governments, which are slashing spending at precisely the worst moment, is also a priority.&amp;quot;   &amp;nbsp;  Paul Krugman sounds the  alarm :   The financial and economic news since the middle of last month has been really, really bad. And what&amp;rsquo;s truly scary is that we&amp;rsquo;re entering a period of severe crisis with weak, confused leadership...  How bad is it? Normally sober people are sounding apocalyptic. On Thursday, the bond trader and blogger John Jansen declared that current conditions are &amp;ldquo;the financial equivalent of the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution,&amp;rdquo; while Joel Prakken of Macroeconomic Advisers says that the economy seems to be on &amp;ldquo;the edge of the abyss.&amp;quot;...  I hope that it [The rescue plan right now being debated in the House - Ken] passes, simply because we&amp;rsquo;re in the middle of a financial panic, and another no vote would make the panic even worse.    As Krugman points out that one of the key factors in the current panic is that Sec. Paulson allowed Lehman Brothers to go bankrupt.&amp;nbsp; Why?&amp;nbsp; GJMandinka, in the comments section of HuffingtonPost.com  article ,  notes :   There has been a long-time rivalry between Lehman and Goldman Sachs. Hank Paulsen was CEO of Goldman Sachs before he took his current job. Big surprise that he decided to &amp;quot;draw the line&amp;quot; at Lehman....   When Krugman pointed to Lehman Brothers as being a &amp;quot;roach motel&amp;quot; the New York Times article he refers to is this Landon Thomas  report :   ...  Two weeks after Lehman spiraled into bankruptcy, hedge funds that did business with the Wall Street bank are still fighting to get their money out of the firm. For some, it has become a life-or-death struggle.   Big funds like GLG, Harbinger, Amber Capital and Elliott Associates have varying degrees of exposure to Lehman Brothers.   But even a $6.2 million fund run by students at the Darden School of Business at the  University of Virginia  has been caught up in the bankruptcy. The fund, like its larger counterparts, used Lehman as a prime broker, and no longer has access to its money....   For a definition of hedge funds go  here .&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; For a total dollar amount of hedge funds go  here .&amp;nbsp; For tax and regulation (or lack of)&amp;nbsp; information about hedge funds go  here .&amp;nbsp; Another ticking time bomb.   Flooding the international market with over 600 billion USD as Fed. Chair Benanke did hasn&#039;t helped to loosen credit because financial institutions are hoarding their money now.   Taking over AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac, while engineering the consolidation of U.S. financial institutions through the use of a little known regulation from 1933 by Bernanke has not helped regain trust in the financial community although it has cost another 600 billion+ USD.   Now the House is considering a 700 billion USD injection of liquidity that will only be a stop gap short term &amp;quot;finger in the dike&amp;quot; or prayer measure because Paulson and Bernanke have not thought out real solutions to these problems that are facing America and the world.  What does this mean...not a religious armageddon but a financial one if trust cannot be restored through governmental intervention in the capitalist financial system.   &amp;nbsp; </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/kennethdebacker/CZG5</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/kennethdebacker/CZG5/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:22:51 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/kennethdebacker/CZG5</guid>
            <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Ken</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>3</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZG5/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>And the Fools On the Hill See the Sun Going Down on America - Just Another Day In Paradise....Rantings of A Mad Woman</title>
            <description>  The Fools on the Hill......   I love that those all-knowing Grand Wizards of all things important, sitting on the Hill in D.C., are JUST figuring out what many have known for 10 friggin&#039; years.  The so-called housing bubble, that   churn and burn   growth of a market based on air, was the ONLY thing propping up an economy that has needed to do an adjustment since 1998; Staved off by the Republicans in their bids to keep the sleazy corporatists going without oversight.....    UNFETTERED GROWTH without any natural controls is called CANCER....   </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CZMZ</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CZMZ/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:46:38 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/Jan/CZMZ</guid>
            <dc:creator>The Mad Woman</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/fcb34917d9fd3e3809_u806mvulr.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>The Mad Woman</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZMZ/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>We&#039;re f*(^%d</title>
            <description>The combination of added national debt in the trillions, the huge increase in money supply to fund the bailouts and the reduction in private lending as government borrowing crowds out the private sector will lead to inflation, high unemployment as private investment is suppressed, and high interest rates as the government borrows more to pay bond holders and bad debt holders that it has bailed out.  Oh, and higher taxes probably.  Goverment investment in everything will suffer.   
  
The next President will have no flexibility to do anything much.  We can maybe save some money by ending the war in Iraq, but that&#039;s going to look like a drop in the bucket.</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/bullwinkle/CZMM</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/bullwinkle/CZMM/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:59:09 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/bullwinkle/CZMM</guid>
            <dc:creator>Doc Martin</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Doc Martin</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CZMM/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Palin Warning #1</title>
            <description>Several email exposes regarding Sarah Palin have landed in my in-box.  The most useful is the message from MoveOn.org (go to the extended Post Text). 
 
I hope my mother, my wife and my teenage daughter will excuse this one - but, my initial reaction holds that McCain is having a post midlife crisis moment here.  Now he gets to spend the rest of the campaign on stage with either a blonde or a brunette former beauty queen; sometimes both. 
 
Considering the depth and experience available to him in the rest of the GOP universe I am completely baffled that there can be any other reason for this decision.  I am now even more appreciative for the intelligent and practical decision by Barack Obama to grab Joe Biden as his VP running mate. 
 
The supposed VP Debate won&#039;t be.  With this line-up it is clear that candidate Palin will carefuly recite radical right wing talking points fed to her by the McCain handlers.  Even if Biden were allowed in the format/rules to challenge her on any issues we&#039;ll hear nothing original. 
 
Thus there could not be a more distinct choice between the two tickets.  Looking at the &quot;rap-sheet&quot; provided by MoveOn, American voters can have no doubts of the radical and destructive policies and positions John McCain is accepting by filling the GOP ticket with Palin.</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/Cq7N</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/Cq7N/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 09:56:44 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/Cq7N</guid>
            <dc:creator>Ralph T</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/22970b0cb82ab5861b_e6yymv1de.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Ralph T</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/Cq7N/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Democrats short-circuit health care reform debate by accepting Republican framing</title>
            <description> When Democrat Mark Udall debated Republican Bob Schaffer in July, he made no effort to refute Schaffer&amp;rsquo;s distortions surrounding health care reform. In fact, he essentially short-circuited meaningful debate by adopting the nebulous right-wing description of single-payer health care as &amp;ldquo;government health care,&amp;rdquo; thus capitulating to Republican framing of the issue.   Just what is government health care? Is it the more than 60 percent&amp;nbsp;of all health care costs that are paid by taxpayers, including subsidies for inflated costs of private insurances? Private insurers skim the cream and game the system for profit, and count on government (taxpayers) to pick up the health care costs of all whose coverage they reject. Does government health care include the 70 percent&amp;nbsp;of our legislators&amp;rsquo; health coverage that is funded by taxpayers?   Democrats who facilely echo GOP talking points grossly misrepresent single-payer health care. In fact, contrary to assertions by the right-wing &amp;ldquo;free market&amp;rdquo; chorus, only single-risk-pool insurance provides true free choice of private providers, the same as traditional Medicare before Republicans moved to privatize Medicare (at 12 percent&amp;nbsp;higher cost). Private insurance plans limit choice to &amp;ldquo;in plan&amp;rdquo; doctors, often requiring change of providers when plans are changed. Only single payer is capable of providing comprehensive, continuous health care benefits and protection against medical bankruptcy.   Our leaders should vigorously protest the abomination of Medicare prescription drug reform that was written by insurance and pharmaceutical lobbies with billions of dollars of taxpayer subsidies and inflated profits to benefit their bottom lines, while prohibiting negotiation of bulk drug prices.   Instead of privatizing Medicare-for-profit, why not improve and expand its coverage for everyone? Traditional Medicare has lower overhead costs &amp;ndash; less than 4 percent&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; whereas private insurances divert 25&amp;nbsp;percent or more to profits, lobbying, marketing, exhorbitant CEO salaries and wasteful administrative costs. Profit is a perverse incentive for health insurance, which protects its bottom line by reducing benefits and shifting ever-greater costs to consumers.   The insulated political class in Washington, dependent upon corporate money and privy to 70 percent taxpayer-subsidized health coverage, seem out of touch with the U.S. people. Polls by Pew and others have revealed that increasing numbers &amp;ndash; 54 to 65 percent &amp;ndash; support a national single-payer health care plan. A recent study reported in the  Annals of Internal Medicine  (3-31-08) that 59 percent of U.S. physicians &amp;ldquo;support government legislation to establish national health insurance,&amp;rdquo; an increase of 10 percent since 2002.   Notably, more than 20 federal and state studies since 1990, including the 2007 Lewin Group evaluation in Colorado, have demonstrated that single-payer health insurance is the only reform model that can both save money  and  provide comprehensive health care benefits for all. The Colorado single-payer proposal and Rep. John Conyers&amp;rsquo; national health care bill, HR 676, both deserve serious further study.   We have everything to gain from an honest dialogue about quality-, saftey-centered universal single payer health care, in place of profiteering health insurance gatekeepers. </description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/micheleswenson/CqPs</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/micheleswenson/CqPs/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:50:53 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/micheleswenson/CqPs</guid>
            <dc:creator>Michele S</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Michele S</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CqPs/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Everyone invited! Progressive Democrats and The Nation are hosting &quot;Progressive Central&quot; the week of the Democratic National Convention</title>
            <description>Progressive Democrats of America with  The Nation  magazine are setting up headquarters at Central Presbyterian Church (1660 Sherman St.), where they have scheduled issues forums over 5 days of the Democratic National Convention.   Free daily panels moderated by  The Nation &#039;s John Nichols at 11 AM, are followed by additional panels covering Health Care on Monday, August 25, followed the rest of the week with forums on Media and Election Reform, Economic Justice, Global Warming and Constitutional Law.   Participants include Reps. John Conyers, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Keith Ellison and Lynn Woolsey; Tom Hayden, Jim Hightower and authors David Sirota and Vincent Bugliosi; various writers and publisher of  The Nation ; journalist and radio host Laura Flanders; Jeff Cohen, author and founder of FAIR; and many others.   For schedule and more info, check Web site  http://pdamerica.org , click on  &amp;quot;Progressive Central&amp;quot;  in green bar at page top. Watch for posting of PDF event flyer.  Also, check link to HCAC page for  Democratic Convention Actions around Health Care .</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/micheleswenson/CqPk</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/micheleswenson/CqPk/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:00:39 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/micheleswenson/CqPk</guid>
            <dc:creator>Michele S</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Michele S</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CqPk/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Conservative Attack on Local Law Enforcement</title>
            <description>This story required a time delayed double-take when it appeared in a Denver paper this weekend (read once, put it aside in disbelief, and then read it again).  The extended full story comes from the traditional mouthpiece of the GOP in Colorado Springs, the Gazette (go to the Extended Post Text). 
 
Denver area readers didn&#039;t get to see El Paso County Sheriff Terry Maketa&#039;s full response.  Also, it seems that the Gazette reporter and the Heritage Foundation comedian, James Carafano, have never read the National Response Plan (NRP - the Nation&#039;s real Homeland Security policy) and are totally out of touch when it comes to the concept of preparedness and local response. 
 
One of my most memorable duties was to clear the way at Fort Carson for the Colorado National Guard to move the M-577 Armored Command Post vehicle that responded to the Columbine tragedy.  Even that process took hours for authorization and travel time. 
 
It is absolutely commendable that local law enforcement has found 52 missions for the vehicle.  That proves to me that it is multi-functional and that El Paso County Sheriff&#039;s Deputies and Colorado Springs Police are fully trained to use it.  In the horrible event of another large-scale hostage crisis I&#039;m more confident that they are ready. 
 
This is a disappointing piece of reporting that seems pre-disposed to criticize the cops.  Rapid response by local first responders is a key factor in the NRP.  There&#039;s no doubt in my mind that this BEAR could respond very quickly to any hostage or large-scale shooting incident between Pueblo and Fort Collins. 
 
Trying to imply that this is a boondoggle and waste of Federal funds is irresponsible.  Of course the new operators of the vehicle needed training.  That&#039;s just being thorough and responsible.  Mechanical adjustments for high altitude operations are far from design flaws.   
 
Pity what Ms Zubeck and Mr. Carafano would have as comments for the hundreds of Modification Work Orders (MWOs) that are applied to US military vehicles of all types every year.  Without a doubt this &quot;BEAR&quot; should be in Colorado Springs and not some Federal Depot waiting for FEMA to decide it&#039;s OK to use it for a state or local purpose.</description>
            <link>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CqPS</link>
            <comments>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CqPS/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:47:08 MDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/post/ralphtrenary/CqPS</guid>
            <dc:creator>Ralph T</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/profile_picture/22970b0cb82ab5861b_e6yymv1de.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Ralph T</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.progressnowaction.org/page/community/comment_rss/CqPS/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
      </channel>
</rss>