Post from Angie Layton's Blog:
Our voting rights
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
There's a lot going on around voting issues. There are probably going to be three bills that come through the legislature this session. There is a push towards an "all mail ballot". Although this appears to solve some of the problems of voting technology, we essentially already have a mechanism whereby people who wish to obtain mail ballots may do so-- it's called absentee ballots. But a mandatory all mail ballot worries me because unless you hand deliver it to the clerk's office, you never quite know if your ballot will be received and counted. That's why a precinct polling place is wonderful. You walk in, you get checked, you know immediately if you're eligible to vote, and you mark your ballot and return it in a way that ensures your voice is heard. If we vote in precincts then we have the option of precinct tallies. Precinct tallies are essential for GOTV efforts and make it easier to spot errors AND fraud. And recounts are easier to do if a candidate asks for one.

Reader Comments
  
The two concepts aren't mutually exclusive
By Michael Ditto Jan 21st 2008 at 8:09 am MST
Instead of precinct polling places on election day, we could have precinct collection points. The county clerks prepare an update file daily of who has voted, so GOTV is actually easier with mail ballots because it's spread over 20-30 days instead of 12 hours. On E-day, poll workers could still get the classic poll book listing those in the precinct who have not yet returned a ballot and a stack of preprinted ballots for those who need a replacement ballot.

All the mail ballots are bar coded, so poll workers should just scan the barcode and upload their data once an hour to the clerk and the clerk could issue hourly updates on election day. They could also transmit back to the precincts those ballots which came in the mail on election day as well as those that are dropped off at other collection points so that the poll workers can check them off.

That kind of stuff can be easily accomplished with off-the-shelf hardware and software (palm smartphones with the barcode attachment), involves data that's not sensitive (not the actual votes but just whether or not a ballot was turned in) and a technology failure is not a showstopper, it just means the clerk wouldn't get the counts until the end of the day.
  


Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account

Start Blogging










Anne Zook
Chaotic Utopia
Civic Satisfaction
CJ's Bullhorn
Coyote Gulch
Colorado Comments
Colorado Confidential
Colorado Pols
Coloradolib
Colorado Media Matters
Curious Stranger
DemNotes
Democracy for Colorado
Democracy in Progress
Empires Fall
Environment Colorado
Coloradans for Fairness and Equality
Four Seasons
Janus Online
JB Holston
Liberal Church Nerd
Mile High Delphi
NatureBlog
New West Boulder
Nic and the City
Oak Creek Forum
RockyWatch
SquareState.net
Stygius
They Get Letters
Tom Tancredo Watch
Unbossed
Vestal Vespa
Wash Park Prophet


African-American Political Pundit
AmericaBLOG
American Prospect
Antiwar.com
Billmon
Blog for America
BRAD Blog
BuzzFlash
Campus Progress
CommonBits
Common Cause Blog
Common Dreams
Crooks and Liars
Daily Kos
David Sirota
DU
Digby
EchoDitto
Eschaton
Gadflyer
Huffington Post
Media Matters
Matthew Gross
MoJo Blog
MoveOn ActionForum
MyDD
NDN Blog
NewsHounds
Of, By and For
O'Franken Factor
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Raw Story
Street Prophets
Talking Points Memo
TPM Cafe
TalkLeft
Think Progress
Truthout Blog
Wonkette