Dear Public Diary # 2
|
|
| Also listed in: OPEN COURT |
Comments |
Mail to a Friend
Categories: Equality / Civil Rights, Peace & Social Justice, Effective & Ethical Government, Property Rights
Categories: Equality / Civil Rights, Peace & Social Justice, Effective & Ethical Government, Property Rights
Just as I expected. Judge David R. Lass, the collaborating attorneys, and other named officials, are ignoring my publicly made charges at www.coloradoopencourt.blogspot.com, and are continuing their criminal activity.
After the May 22, 2008 Notice was sent;
1. May 28, 2008. Attorney Alison (Sunny) Maynard, filed among other Responses and Requests, a Motion To Continue And For Limited Stay. She states that she is still answering and defending grievances filed against her with the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel (OARC), by attorney Victor Boog and some "unnamed person."
Gee, I was told by the Attorney Regulation Counsel that they DO NOT ACCEPT ANONYMOUS COMPLAINTS.
She goes on to say: "The point is that it is Boog who chose to move the dispute from this court to a new forum (disciplinary proceedings). I am being forced to litigate my client's issues there-to show the evidence and legal authority I have-to defend against the disciplinary charges. OARC's entertaining these charges while this litigation is pending obviously creates a conflict for me."
Gee again. The OARC, specifically Louise Culberson-Smith, told me that they can not investigate complaints while the case is still in litigation. She also told me that no one can "litigate" their case with the OARC, and that by my asking them to investigate the violations of law and code of conduct, I was asking them to litigate my case. Can you explain yourself Ms. Smith? Why were my complaints considered to be "litigation," and their's is not?
Ms. Maynard also states: "I certainly believe that what I (and, obviously, my clients) are fighting is a criminal racket, involving not only Victor Boog and his clients, but Glenn Porzak and his clients, and at least three judges."
NO KIDDING!!!! Why is it a "criminal racket" Ms. Maynard? Is it because you know that Judge Lass never had jurisdiction to act then, and still does not today? Is it because you know that it was illegal for Judge Lass and the new Association to force me into contracts, and that everyone including you, are still unlawfully upholding the invalid contracts? Is it because you know that Judge Lass gave Glenn Porzak's clients title to Homeowners water rights without a trial? Is it because you know that Judge Lass established for Victor Boog and his clients, an Association foreign to all founding documents of Spring Creek Ranch, and which violates members rights?
This should show everyone how defendants' (plaintiff's in this case), lose their case and their rights, and how the truth is buried. Ms. Maynard, as did all the attorneys I hired, purposely put out true statements but without backing them up with the facts. The statements are then ruled as frivolous or unsupported claims, and Victor Boog and his clients win another one. Had Ms. Maynard really been defending her clients, she would have submitted a Motion to Cease and Desist, not a Continuance.
2. June 6, 2008, Judge Lass ruled on a Summary Judgement Ms. Maynard submitted on October 17, 2007.
3. June 6, 2008, Ms. Maynard files a Motion For Contingent Extension Of Time
4. June 6, 2008, I sent a 2nd NOTICE to all mentioned in my public account at
www.coloradoopencourt.blogspot.com. Because the Colorado Supreme Court and Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey, are vested with the supervisory and disciplinary powers and duties over all Colorado judges and attorneys, and because they ignored the 1st Notice, I sent the 2nd Notice via certified mail no. 7003 2260 0003 7134 9401. Now anyone can confirm that the Colorado Supreme Court knows about the corruption and criminal activity within our court and legal system, and is doing nothing to stop it.
5. June 10, 2008, Judge Lass issues a Preliminary Order Regarding (Maynard's) Requested Continuance Of Trial. Because no response had been filed yet, Judge Lass doesn't rule for or against the continuance, but he does encourage everyone to keep going ahead with all plans for the trial set for July 25 - 30, 2008. He wrote: ". . the Court also notifies the parties that they should carry on with their very best efforts to timely and diligently prepare for all upcoming trial events, including mediation.
6. June 12, 2008, attorney Victor Boog responds to the Motion for Continuance.
Why are they able to ignore me, the truth and the Law? Because they know that no one will hold them accountable. Indeed, even though I sent the 2nd Notice via certified mail, I still have not been contacted by anyone from the Colorado Supreme Court, and it only confirms that the corruption comes from the top down. It confirms their arrogance and their contempt for our Laws. It also confirms their true character, and that they should never have been trusted to be Judges and Justices in our Courts, as well as that the named attorneys should never have been allowed into the legal profession just because they are able to pass a test.
This is not my test, it's yours.
After the May 22, 2008 Notice was sent;
1. May 28, 2008. Attorney Alison (Sunny) Maynard, filed among other Responses and Requests, a Motion To Continue And For Limited Stay. She states that she is still answering and defending grievances filed against her with the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel (OARC), by attorney Victor Boog and some "unnamed person."
Gee, I was told by the Attorney Regulation Counsel that they DO NOT ACCEPT ANONYMOUS COMPLAINTS.
She goes on to say: "The point is that it is Boog who chose to move the dispute from this court to a new forum (disciplinary proceedings). I am being forced to litigate my client's issues there-to show the evidence and legal authority I have-to defend against the disciplinary charges. OARC's entertaining these charges while this litigation is pending obviously creates a conflict for me."
Gee again. The OARC, specifically Louise Culberson-Smith, told me that they can not investigate complaints while the case is still in litigation. She also told me that no one can "litigate" their case with the OARC, and that by my asking them to investigate the violations of law and code of conduct, I was asking them to litigate my case. Can you explain yourself Ms. Smith? Why were my complaints considered to be "litigation," and their's is not?
Ms. Maynard also states: "I certainly believe that what I (and, obviously, my clients) are fighting is a criminal racket, involving not only Victor Boog and his clients, but Glenn Porzak and his clients, and at least three judges."
NO KIDDING!!!! Why is it a "criminal racket" Ms. Maynard? Is it because you know that Judge Lass never had jurisdiction to act then, and still does not today? Is it because you know that it was illegal for Judge Lass and the new Association to force me into contracts, and that everyone including you, are still unlawfully upholding the invalid contracts? Is it because you know that Judge Lass gave Glenn Porzak's clients title to Homeowners water rights without a trial? Is it because you know that Judge Lass established for Victor Boog and his clients, an Association foreign to all founding documents of Spring Creek Ranch, and which violates members rights?
This should show everyone how defendants' (plaintiff's in this case), lose their case and their rights, and how the truth is buried. Ms. Maynard, as did all the attorneys I hired, purposely put out true statements but without backing them up with the facts. The statements are then ruled as frivolous or unsupported claims, and Victor Boog and his clients win another one. Had Ms. Maynard really been defending her clients, she would have submitted a Motion to Cease and Desist, not a Continuance.
2. June 6, 2008, Judge Lass ruled on a Summary Judgement Ms. Maynard submitted on October 17, 2007.
3. June 6, 2008, Ms. Maynard files a Motion For Contingent Extension Of Time
4. June 6, 2008, I sent a 2nd NOTICE to all mentioned in my public account at
www.coloradoopencourt.blogspot.com. Because the Colorado Supreme Court and Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey, are vested with the supervisory and disciplinary powers and duties over all Colorado judges and attorneys, and because they ignored the 1st Notice, I sent the 2nd Notice via certified mail no. 7003 2260 0003 7134 9401. Now anyone can confirm that the Colorado Supreme Court knows about the corruption and criminal activity within our court and legal system, and is doing nothing to stop it.
5. June 10, 2008, Judge Lass issues a Preliminary Order Regarding (Maynard's) Requested Continuance Of Trial. Because no response had been filed yet, Judge Lass doesn't rule for or against the continuance, but he does encourage everyone to keep going ahead with all plans for the trial set for July 25 - 30, 2008. He wrote: ". . the Court also notifies the parties that they should carry on with their very best efforts to timely and diligently prepare for all upcoming trial events, including mediation.
6. June 12, 2008, attorney Victor Boog responds to the Motion for Continuance.
Why are they able to ignore me, the truth and the Law? Because they know that no one will hold them accountable. Indeed, even though I sent the 2nd Notice via certified mail, I still have not been contacted by anyone from the Colorado Supreme Court, and it only confirms that the corruption comes from the top down. It confirms their arrogance and their contempt for our Laws. It also confirms their true character, and that they should never have been trusted to be Judges and Justices in our Courts, as well as that the named attorneys should never have been allowed into the legal profession just because they are able to pass a test.
This is not my test, it's yours.
