|
|
| Also listed in: 1stProtestinTheStreet.Org | Broom Brigade | CivicSatisfaction.org | Denver County | Operation Bird Dog- Colorado |
Support Dennis Kucinich's resolution! From DailyKos.com's front page:
The House will have to dispense with Rep. Dennis Kucinich's latest move to impeach President Bush, which he gave notice of his intention to raise as a question of the privileges of the House on Thursday. Under clause 2 of Rule IX, when a Member other than the Majority or Minority Leader raises a question of the privileges of the House from the floor, the chair may designate a time for its consideration within two legislative days. The expectation is that the resolution will be referred to the Judiciary committee as were Kucinich's previous three impeachment resolutions (two for Cheney, one for Bush). Those resolutions have received no consideration in the committee, so Kucinich vowed to continue bringing such resolutions every 30 days until there was some action.
Perhaps because the rules permit Kucinich to continue to bring impeachment resolutions and receive privilege for them each time (no matter how often he brings them, as I've mentioned from time to time), the Judiciary committee is expected for the first time to try to find a way to accommodate some sort of action on the question.
I would like to point out that there are people who believe that George W. Bush deserves criminal investigation into whether or not his actions as President are criminal. There has been a book, which has been uttterly ignored by corporate media, by the former prosecuter of Charles Manson, Vincent Bugliosi "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder". Andy Ostroy, The Ostroy Report, writes:
Bugliosi, most famous for prosecuting Charles Manson for the 1969 Tate-LaBianca murders, appeared Friday morning on MSNBC's Morning Joe program with host Joe Scarborough, NBC's Andrea Mitchell and the Boston Globe's Mike Barnicle. Citing reams of documentary evidence to support his contention that Bush should be tried for murder, Bugliosi bases his case not on Bush's false claims of WMD, but rather that the president lied that the WMD posed a grave and imminent threat to the security of the United States, which in turn became the justification for the war.
There is not a question of "if" but "when" for the prosecution of crimes by Mr. Bush and his cohort.
















