Post from Steve Ludwig's Blog:
Colorado's Future: Higher Ed
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
A recent cover story by Time magazine, an essay in Newsweek, and an editorial in the British weekly the Economist all reaffirm one thing: America's position as the top of the world economic ladder is not guaranteed.

History is unkind to those who stop top to enjoy the view while on top. Just ask the British, Spanish, French, Dutch, and Romans.

Our economic competitors - China, India, and Europe - look at what makes America such an economic powerhouse and try to duplicate what they can. One area is education.

While America has 18 of the top 20 colleges in the world, this position is not guaranteed as our competitors build colleges and have a clear goal to create world-class institutions to directly compete with us.

Colleges and universities are incubators of new ideas, cutting edge research, and the training ground for professionals of all stripes. A strong higher education system (2-year and 4-year colleges) is critical for economic growth and a strong economy, which, in turn, fuels job development.

In Colorado, we need to focus our priorities on supporting public higher education. The passage of Referendum C is a start, but we have a long way to go.

Those of us who have lived in Colorado for a number of years have been through a few boom and bust cycles. While our economy has diversified to help mitigate the severity of those ups and downs, factors, economic development officials say more investment is needed in infrastructure (roads/mass transit, K-12, higher ed) in order to keep Colorado's economy on an even keel.

While Ward Churchill and the Boulder campus football program get all the attention, policy makers need to focus on:
• attracting and retaining Colorado's best and brightest young minds;
• expanding access to graduate and certificate programs for working adults;
• keeping and attracting world class faculty;
• helping Fitzsimmons become a biotechnology and medical research hub for the country;
• Have higher ed institutions partner with K-12 leaders to help increase Colorado's high school graduate rates.

To do anything less is not serving the people of Colorado.

Reader Comments
  
John Andrews doesn't agree.
By Alan Franklin Jun 22nd 2006 at 10:31 am MDT
This "academic" stuff isn't what's important: football players and Ward Churchill are definitely the subjects of choice for the "separation of school and state" crowd.

"They too are honorable men..."
  
Thank you
By Sam Jun 22nd 2006 at 12:34 pm MDT
Thanks for your fight! Keep it up.
  


Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account

Start Blogging










Anne Zook
Chaotic Utopia
Civic Satisfaction
CJ's Bullhorn
Coyote Gulch
Colorado Comments
Colorado Confidential
Colorado Pols
Coloradolib
Colorado Media Matters
Curious Stranger
DemNotes
Democracy for Colorado
Democracy in Progress
Empires Fall
Environment Colorado
Coloradans for Fairness and Equality
Four Seasons
Janus Online
JB Holston
Liberal Church Nerd
Mile High Delphi
NatureBlog
New West Boulder
Nic and the City
Oak Creek Forum
RockyWatch
SquareState.net
Stygius
They Get Letters
Tom Tancredo Watch
Unbossed
Vestal Vespa
Wash Park Prophet


African-American Political Pundit
AmericaBLOG
American Prospect
Antiwar.com
Billmon
Blog for America
BRAD Blog
BuzzFlash
Campus Progress
CommonBits
Common Cause Blog
Common Dreams
Crooks and Liars
Daily Kos
David Sirota
DU
Digby
EchoDitto
Eschaton
Gadflyer
Huffington Post
Media Matters
Matthew Gross
MoJo Blog
MoveOn ActionForum
MyDD
NDN Blog
NewsHounds
Of, By and For
O'Franken Factor
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Raw Story
Street Prophets
Talking Points Memo
TPM Cafe
TalkLeft
Think Progress
Truthout Blog
Wonkette