Write Comment
Write your comment in the form below. Be sure to 'Preview' your comment to make sure that it will appear as you want it to.
Comment Title:
Your name:
Comment Text:

No HTML allowed. All HTML tags will be removed. URLs will be converted to clickable links.

Enter the text shown
in the image:
Unregistered users must be validated in order to protect this website
from content spam.
You can skip this step by registering.
   
You Are Commenting On This Post:
An outrage committed on this blog
On March 7th, 2006, we broke the story about former Independence Institute counsel Robert Corry's arrest and pending trial on sexual assault charges.

On April 24th, the Rocky Mountain News published a story that confirmed the bare facts but offered little else about the case.

In the United States, an accused person enjoys the presumption of innocence until found guilty in a court of law. Right-wing hack lawyers responsible for partisan attacks on affirmative action, "leftist" academics, and hate crimes law are still protected by that presumption of innocence. The charges against him and the ongoing court proceeding are a matter of public record, however, and it was in the public interest to disclose them.

In the last few weeks, various defenders of Robert Corry have kept up a thread of comments on our blog that I didn't even know was taking place. I was shocked to learn, just this morning, that a comment was posted by a person claiming personal knowledge of the case and both parties that identifies the alleged victim and makes numerous derogatory references to her moral character.

This is a major problem, as everyone reading this should know. We have deleted the comments which identified the alleged victim, right after sending them to the appropriate media. We've also retained a copy in case it is needed as part of the criminal case, but for no other purpose.

Without expressing my personal opinion of this (you can imagine), let me just say that we are totally outraged. We have no policy governing this kind of thing because we've never dealt with it before, but the comments in question were clearly made to smear the credibility of an alleged rape victim -- and to intimidate her personally by posting her name. It's totally reprehensible and I will not tolerate it.



Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account

Start Blogging










Anne Zook
Chaotic Utopia
Civic Satisfaction
CJ's Bullhorn
Coyote Gulch
Colorado Comments
Colorado Confidential
Colorado Pols
Coloradolib
Colorado Media Matters
Curious Stranger
DemNotes
Democracy for Colorado
Democracy in Progress
Empires Fall
Environment Colorado
Coloradans for Fairness and Equality
Four Seasons
Janus Online
JB Holston
Liberal Church Nerd
Mile High Delphi
NatureBlog
New West Boulder
Nic and the City
Oak Creek Forum
RockyWatch
SquareState.net
Stygius
They Get Letters
Tom Tancredo Watch
Unbossed
Vestal Vespa
Wash Park Prophet


African-American Political Pundit
AmericaBLOG
American Prospect
Antiwar.com
Billmon
Blog for America
BRAD Blog
BuzzFlash
Campus Progress
CommonBits
Common Cause Blog
Common Dreams
Crooks and Liars
Daily Kos
David Sirota
DU
Digby
EchoDitto
Eschaton
Gadflyer
Huffington Post
Media Matters
Matthew Gross
MoJo Blog
MoveOn ActionForum
MyDD
NDN Blog
NewsHounds
Of, By and For
O'Franken Factor
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Raw Story
Street Prophets
Talking Points Memo
TPM Cafe
TalkLeft
Think Progress
Truthout Blog
Wonkette