Write Comment
Write your comment in the form below. Be sure to 'Preview' your comment to make sure that it will appear as you want it to.
Comment Title:
Your name:
Comment Text:

No HTML allowed. All HTML tags will be removed. URLs will be converted to clickable links.

Enter the text shown
in the image:
Unregistered users must be validated in order to protect this website
from content spam.
You can skip this step by registering.
   
You Are Commenting On This Post:
Who watches the watchers? WE do!
(x-posted, because I care)

I've been at the Mildly Toasted stage of Cheesed Off ever since Thursday, because of Colorado Ethics Watch First Annual "Ethics Roundup".

It's not that I think it's a bad idea, or that it was done by bad/misguided people. Definitely not. But on two of the three sites where I've seen it mentioned, I am not the only one wondering why the heck Wes McKinley got added to the Ten Most Corrupt list.

Here's what they got him on: his staff failed to file required campaign reports on time. Twice.

Yes, someone should have done it, and yes, it's Wes's responsibility, in the end, to see it got done. But he got fined, so he's paid his debt to society, as it were. Also, it should be noted there were NO irregularities mentioned in the CEW's report, just the naughty, naughty lateness.

It has not yet been adequately explained to me how being late with something makes a person corrupt. (If failing to meet deadlines = Evil!, wow, am *I* ever going to Hell!)

I'll tell you what this reminds me of -- school. Did you ever have an assignment that you didn't get finished on time? I sure did. Some teachers would dock you a letter grade. OTHERS would refuse to take any late papers at all, ever, and give you an F.

I guess if CEW wants to be That Guy, they have a right to make that choice. But it seems to me that being rigid and punitive, equating failures of clerical technicalities with conflicts of interest, alleged bribery and/or physical violence, brings their sense of balance and judgment into question.

If their judgment is questionable, why should the public care about who they put on their list?

So all in all, I'm afraid I have to give CEW a C- for their report. Next time, please show your work.



Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account

Start Blogging










Anne Zook
Chaotic Utopia
Civic Satisfaction
CJ's Bullhorn
Coyote Gulch
Colorado Comments
Colorado Confidential
Colorado Pols
Coloradolib
Colorado Media Matters
Curious Stranger
DemNotes
Democracy for Colorado
Democracy in Progress
Empires Fall
Environment Colorado
Coloradans for Fairness and Equality
Four Seasons
Janus Online
JB Holston
Liberal Church Nerd
Mile High Delphi
NatureBlog
New West Boulder
Nic and the City
Oak Creek Forum
RockyWatch
SquareState.net
Stygius
They Get Letters
Tom Tancredo Watch
Unbossed
Vestal Vespa
Wash Park Prophet


African-American Political Pundit
AmericaBLOG
American Prospect
Antiwar.com
Billmon
Blog for America
BRAD Blog
BuzzFlash
Campus Progress
CommonBits
Common Cause Blog
Common Dreams
Crooks and Liars
Daily Kos
David Sirota
DU
Digby
EchoDitto
Eschaton
Gadflyer
Huffington Post
Media Matters
Matthew Gross
MoJo Blog
MoveOn ActionForum
MyDD
NDN Blog
NewsHounds
Of, By and For
O'Franken Factor
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Raw Story
Street Prophets
Talking Points Memo
TPM Cafe
TalkLeft
Think Progress
Truthout Blog
Wonkette