Write Comment
Write your comment in the form below. Be sure to 'Preview' your comment to make sure that it will appear as you want it to.
Comment Title:
Your name:
Comment Text:

No HTML allowed. All HTML tags will be removed. URLs will be converted to clickable links.

Enter the text shown
in the image:
Unregistered users must be validated in order to protect this website
from content spam.
You can skip this step by registering.
   
You Are Replying To This Comment:
Re: Not that much of a Disagreement
By Doc Mar 3rd 2008 at 4:21 pm MST
Given the willingness of the administration to conduct internal counter-terrorist activities against our own citizens, then cover its tail by forgiving the agencies that help it creating a environment of paranoia, which keeps people from marching in the streets, not speaking their minds other than to anonymous pollsters, we have to have local leaders who are willing to stand up to the government and recruiters who a) do not give districts all of the options available to them, i.e. opting out being one of them, b) force the services to have their recruiters to be completely honest (I personally believe the two words 'recruiter' and 'honesty' to be an oxymoron based on my own experience.)

I have no issue with persons who have reached their eighteenth birthday, who must register with Selective Service doing so, or choosing to take the bribes offered by the military to make it seem more palatable. They have have reached the age of voting and majority in every way but alcohol consumption. They make the choice to join freely... as did I... and sign the enlistment contract for their own reasons, well thought out or blissfully naive. But to cultivate schools as a resource for harvesting in lieu of and in replacement to conscription is dead wrong....

You and I both know signing on the bottom line doesn't always give you the 'experience' you think you're going to get or that your recruiter is telling you are going to have. You can always serve the nation when you graduate by becoming an Agricultural Agent, Postal Worker, Social Security Case Worker, FBI Agent, Policeman, Fireman or anything other than something that will put you in harms way in a hostile foreign nation with your only justification for being there being an enlistment bonus... that is truly a disservice to parents and communities that lose these fine young people... for what?

What I don't understand is why the military has a test that dictates whether or not a school gets funding and these other government agencies don't? Hmm? Could it be that if the military didn't have this budget string they wouldn't get anyone at all? Remember the bumper sticker about the bake sale for Air Force bombers?

When the moron in charge (MIC, for us former military types) charges off into battle half cocked, has to lie to get the votes to do it, and then has to continually lie even after the intelligence is made public about every excuse he used holds no water, should our young people pay that price with their lives. No... no... and no.
At some point, somebody's got to stand-up to someone in authority and confront the BS 'stay the course' mentality that is costing us lives, tax dollars, and our freedom.
You Are Commenting On This Post:
DC schools slap the hands of military recruiters, ban ASVAB test from public schools...
Got this email this morning from the VVAW news net, and thought it might be important to those of you who would rather not have your children fighting the oil industry's wars for them. It doesn't seem like a lot, but its a lot more official than standing on a street corner with signs and facing the possibility of illegal assembly charges. It read:

"The District of Columbia Public Schools, apparently responding to multiple requests by city residents and recent experiences in neighboring jurisdictions, has taken the extraordinary step of banning the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) test from all public schools in Washington, DC.

In a letter dated February 29, 2008, Sara Wilson, of the Critical Response Team of the Office of the Chancellor wrote to DC activist John Judge, "After speaking with Kimberly Hood-Berry, the Deputy Chief for Academic Support Services and the Head Counselor, Merita Carter, they have decided to look for an alternative career exploration test to be used in place of ASVAB. While they are searching for the best alternative, counselors will be informed not to use ASVAB."

Last week, officials from neighboring Prince George's County, Maryland were outraged when they discovered the military had not informed school officials of their option to withhold private information, including social security numbers and ASVAB test results, from military recruiters. Federal regulations require the military to inform school districts of their right to withhold test information from recruiters.

The ASVAB is administered to 605,000 public school children every year. Although internal military documents identify the ASVAB as a recruiting device, it is marketed in schools as a "career exploration program".

This development has the potential to bring down the ASVAB across the country. That's how angry school officials are becoming.

This form, provided by military representatives to Prince George's County, MD School Officials, omits Option 8:


http://dc.indymedia.org/media/anti-warwar/display/35882/index.php

School officials in Montgomery, Maryland were also unaware of the option to withhold test results from military recruiting services. When they learned of Option 8 two years ago, Montgomery officials changed their policy by requiring parental permission to take the test and selecting Option 8 in schools across the sprawling district.

See USMEPCOM Regulation 601.4 Personnel Procurement Student Testing Program 25 July, 2005, pages 12 & 13 for an explanation of the various options available to public school systems:

http://www.mepcom.army.mil/publications/pdf/regs/r-0601-004.pdf

Have you contacted your school system about the ASVAB release option they select? Have you downloaded the form that has ignited this firestorm of controversy and do you understand its volatile contents? This is not a spectator sport. We have school officials in one, and possibly two major districts, who are making calls to fellow administrators across the country, to warn them about the military's deceptive practices. We can kill this insidious recruiting tool if you would make a call or send an email to your superintendent.
- Pat Elder
Bethesda, MD



Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account

Start Blogging










Anne Zook
Chaotic Utopia
Civic Satisfaction
CJ's Bullhorn
Coyote Gulch
Colorado Comments
Colorado Confidential
Colorado Pols
Coloradolib
Colorado Media Matters
Curious Stranger
DemNotes
Democracy for Colorado
Democracy in Progress
Empires Fall
Environment Colorado
Coloradans for Fairness and Equality
Four Seasons
Janus Online
JB Holston
Liberal Church Nerd
Mile High Delphi
NatureBlog
New West Boulder
Nic and the City
Oak Creek Forum
RockyWatch
SquareState.net
Stygius
They Get Letters
Tom Tancredo Watch
Unbossed
Vestal Vespa
Wash Park Prophet


African-American Political Pundit
AmericaBLOG
American Prospect
Antiwar.com
Billmon
Blog for America
BRAD Blog
BuzzFlash
Campus Progress
CommonBits
Common Cause Blog
Common Dreams
Crooks and Liars
Daily Kos
David Sirota
DU
Digby
EchoDitto
Eschaton
Gadflyer
Huffington Post
Media Matters
Matthew Gross
MoJo Blog
MoveOn ActionForum
MyDD
NDN Blog
NewsHounds
Of, By and For
O'Franken Factor
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Raw Story
Street Prophets
Talking Points Memo
TPM Cafe
TalkLeft
Think Progress
Truthout Blog
Wonkette